[Bug binutils/20096] strip-new crash when strip a specified file

2016-05-13 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20096 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from Andreas

[Bug binutils/20096] New: strip-new crash when strip a specified file

2016-05-13 Thread ecular at 163 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20096 Bug ID: 20096 Summary: strip-new crash when strip a specified file Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binuti

[Bug ld/20093] relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against symbol `foo1' defined in LARGE_COMMON section

2016-05-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20093 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/20093] relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against symbol `foo1' defined in LARGE_COMMON section

2016-05-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20093 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=2168b2688ae343a61c467450068503295a5e3deb commit 2168b2688ae343a61c46745006850329

[Bug ld/20092] Wrong relaxation with R_X86_64_GOTPCREL

2016-05-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20092 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/20093] relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against symbol `foo1' defined in LARGE_COMMON section

2016-05-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20093 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug ld/20093] New: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against symbol `foo1' defined in LARGE_COMMON section

2016-05-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20093 Bug ID: 20093 Summary: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against symbol `foo1' defined in LARGE_COMMON section Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: N

[Bug ld/20092] Wrong relaxation with R_X86_64_GOTPCREL

2016-05-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20092 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/20092] Wrong relaxation with R_X86_64_GOTPCREL

2016-05-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20092 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak --- Created attachment 9260 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9260&action=edit Second object file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug ld/20092] Wrong relaxation with R_X86_64_GOTPCREL

2016-05-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20092 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak --- Created attachment 9259 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9259&action=edit First object file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug ld/20092] New: Wrong relaxation with R_X86_64_GOTPCREL

2016-05-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20092 Bug ID: 20092 Summary: Wrong relaxation with R_X86_64_GOTPCREL Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug ld/20090] [Fix] clang fail on LTO phase with BFD linker (+patch)

2016-05-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20090 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/20070] LLVM gold plugin(LLVMgold.so) report Unexpected resolution failure on ld when LTO, but pass on gold

2016-05-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20070 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||igor.venevtsev at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug ld/20090] [Fix] clang fail on LTO phase with BFD linker (+patch)

2016-05-13 Thread igor.venevtsev at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20090 Igor Venevtsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||igor.venevtsev at gmail dot com ---

[Bug ld/20090] New: [Fix] clang fail on LTO phase with BFD linker (+patch)

2016-05-13 Thread igor.venevtsev at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20090 Bug ID: 20090 Summary: [Fix] clang fail on LTO phase with BFD linker (+patch) Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/20089] New: objcopy.c line 1130 has not size check before accessing isympp array.

2016-05-13 Thread ecular at 163 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20089 Bug ID: 20089 Summary: objcopy.c line 1130 has not size check before accessing isympp array. Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug binutils/20088] Can not supported architectures armv7m(arm-none-eabi-objdump)

2016-05-13 Thread shilin....@ck-telecom.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20088 --- Comment #1 from shilin.guo --- The arm-none-eabi-objdump version is : GNU objdump (GNU Tools for ARM Embedded Processors) 2.26.0.20160310 Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribut

[Bug binutils/20088] New: Can not supported architectures armv7m(arm-none-eabi-objdump)

2016-05-13 Thread shilin....@ck-telecom.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20088 Bug ID: 20088 Summary: Can not supported architectures armv7m(arm-none-eabi-objdump) Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal