[Bug gas/20046] x86 feature request: build an instruction including rex and modr/m

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20046 --- Comment #5 from hpa at zytor dot com --- x87 registers use a different encoding than modr/m; the upper two bits can be something other than 11 for a register operation. However, it seems very unlikely that new x87 instructions will be add

[Bug gas/20046] x86 feature request: build an instruction including rex and modr/m

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20046 --- Comment #4 from hpa at zytor dot com --- "Register" at least for .inspfxs would mean any of GPR, segment, BND, CR, DR, MM or XMM registers. Since YMM, ZMM, or K registers are not encodable without VEX/XOP/EVEX prefixes those presumably sh

[Bug gas/20046] x86 feature request: build an instruction including rex and modr/m

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20046 --- Comment #3 from hpa at zytor dot com --- I thought about it some more, and a better choice that .rex[/w] would be something like .inspfxs[bwlq] , that would be able to generate 66, 67, or REX prefixes as appropriate. The possible combinat

[Bug gold/19047] gold --icf vs REL with negative addend

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19047 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.27 -- You are receiving this mail becaus

[Bug gold/19047] gold --icf vs REL with negative addend

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19047 Roland McGrath changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Version|2.25

[Bug gold/19047] gold --icf vs REL with negative addend

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19047 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_26-branch branch has been updated by Roland McGrath : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d114b830426300f80302ca03ff4322942f63c615 commit d114b830426

[Bug ld/20049] Avoid changing DT_SONAMEs in libopcodes.so and libbfd.so on release branch

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20049 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Avoid change DT_SONAMEs in |Avoid changing DT_SONAMEs

[Bug ld/20049] New: Avoid change DT_SONAMEs in libopcodes.so and libbfd.so on release branch

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20049 Bug ID: 20049 Summary: Avoid change DT_SONAMEs in libopcodes.so and libbfd.so on release branch Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity:

[Bug gas/20046] x86 feature request: build an instruction including rex and modr/m

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20046 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Those are just special pseudo instructions. We need the list of all possible operand combinations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug gas/20046] x86 feature request: build an instruction including rex and modr/m

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20046 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Do

[Bug ld/20030] STM32L4XX : --fix-stm32l4xx-629360 fails to create vldm/vpop veneers for double-precision registers

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030 --- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Christophe, Patch approved - please apply. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mai

[Bug gas/20047] New: The arc assembler outputs an "unrecognized option" error with a weird character in it

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20047 Bug ID: 20047 Summary: The arc assembler outputs an "unrecognized option" error with a weird character in it Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: NEW Seve