[Bug gas/19614] gas for c6x prints "Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections" when gcc compiles things with it

2016-04-06 Thread yselkowi at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19614 Yaakov Selkowitz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yselkowi at redhat dot com -- You

[Bug gold/19891] arm: The order of IFUNC (R_ARM_IRELATIVE and R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT) relocations is incorrect

2016-04-06 Thread dimitry at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19891 --- Comment #2 from dimitry --- Hi, This is the source file: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/master/tests/libs/dlopen_testlib_ifunc.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug gold/19891] arm: The order of IFUNC (R_ARM_IRELATIVE and R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT) relocations is incorrect

2016-04-06 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19891 Han Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug gas/19910] Unsigned arithmetic and %hi()/%low() operators

2016-04-06 Thread orlandoarias at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19910 --- Comment #9 from Orlando Arias --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #8) > Created attachment 9156 [details] > extended patch > > For completeness sake, here is an extended version of the second patch which > includes a couple of addi

[Bug gas/19910] Unsigned arithmetic and %hi()/%low() operators

2016-04-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19910 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9155|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gas/19910] Unsigned arithmetic and %hi()/%low() operators

2016-04-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19910 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9154|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gas/19910] Unsigned arithmetic and %hi()/%low() operators

2016-04-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19910 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Nick Clif

[Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental

2016-04-06 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19872 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab --- > Argh! Why does git do this ? I am sure that I only "git add"ed the > changes the bfd/ directory, so why did it add the others ? Instead of creating partial commits you should consider working on a

Re: [Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental

2016-04-06 Thread Tristan Gingold
> On 05 Apr 2016, at 16:05, nickc at redhat dot com > wrote: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19872 > > --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- > Hi Tristan, > >> you have committed unrelated chunks (pe-dll, aarch64/simulator.c) > > > Argh! Why does git do this ? I am sur

[Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental

2016-04-06 Thread gingold at adacore dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19872 --- Comment #10 from gingold at adacore dot com --- > On 05 Apr 2016, at 16:05, nickc at redhat dot com > wrote: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19872 > > --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- > Hi Tristan, > >> you ha

[Bug gas/19910] Unsigned arithmetic and %hi()/%low() operators

2016-04-06 Thread gingold at adacore dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19910 --- Comment #5 from gingold at adacore dot com --- > On 05 Apr 2016, at 18:04, orlandoarias at gmail dot com > wrote: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19910 > > --- Comment #2 from Orlando Arias --- > (In reply to Nick

Re: [Bug gas/19910] Unsigned arithmetic and %hi()/%low() operators

2016-04-06 Thread Tristan Gingold
> On 05 Apr 2016, at 18:04, orlandoarias at gmail dot com > wrote: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19910 > > --- Comment #2 from Orlando Arias --- > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Greetings: > >> This happens because the assembler does not support U as a su