[Bug gold/16979] gold fails to override built-in symbols

2016-03-30 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16979 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/16979] gold fails to override built-in symbols

2016-03-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16979 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b60ecbc6ddeaf7af8f2515841b58035f0d4d2db7 commit b60ecbc6ddeaf7af8f2515841b5

[Bug gold/19891] New: arm: The order of IFUNC (R_ARM_IRELATIVE and R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT) relocations is incorrect

2016-03-30 Thread dimitry at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19891 Bug ID: 19891 Summary: arm: The order of IFUNC (R_ARM_IRELATIVE and R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT) relocations is incorrect Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Sev

[Bug ld/19886] PR17287 --as-needed regression

2016-03-30 Thread ldv at altlinux dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19886 Dmitry V. Levin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ldv at altlinux dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/19877] crash when using objdump -t -C

2016-03-30 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19877 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot de -

[Bug gold/19887] New: --export-dynamic-symbol ignored for plugin symbols

2016-03-30 Thread eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19887 Bug ID: 19887 Summary: --export-dynamic-symbol ignored for plugin symbols Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Com

[Bug gold/19842] LTO build fails to write call address for weak symbol reference

2016-03-30 Thread matt at godbolt dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842 --- Comment #36 from Matt Godbolt --- Ok; with a GCC 6 snapshot build (20160221) there's no crash when I link with -fdump-ipa-all I will tar up the results and send you an email with the link. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug gold/19842] LTO build fails to write call address for weak symbol reference

2016-03-30 Thread matt at godbolt dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842 --- Comment #35 from Matt Godbolt --- Hi Honza, I checkout the branch of my code where the problem exists and confirmed I could reproduce. Then I re-linked with =-save-temps -fdump-ipa-all and sadly I get an ICE: GNU GIMPLE (DRW-internal-bui

[Bug binutils/19877] crash when using objdump -t -C

2016-03-30 Thread blastrock0 at free dot fr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19877 --- Comment #3 from Philippe --- Hi Nick, Thank you for your response. I sent the report to these people as you said. Cheers, Philippe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/19842] LTO build fails to write call address for weak symbol reference

2016-03-30 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842 --- Comment #34 from Cary Coutant --- I've been trying to come up with a small repro for this, but so far have not been successful. I've tried deepening the inline stack, adding register pressure, and even fiddled with inlining parameters, but

[Bug ld/19886] New: PR17287 --as-needed regression

2016-03-30 Thread glebfm at altlinux dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19886 Bug ID: 19886 Summary: PR17287 --as-needed regression Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug gold/19842] LTO build fails to write call address for weak symbol reference

2016-03-30 Thread matt at godbolt dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842 --- Comment #33 from Matt Godbolt --- Yes, I can do that. I'll get back to you with the relevant information as soon as I can. On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:23 AM hubicka at ucw dot cz < sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org> wrote: > https://sour

[Bug gold/19842] LTO build fails to write call address for weak symbol reference

2016-03-30 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842 --- Comment #32 from hubicka at ucw dot cz --- > Hi all, > > Just following up on this as it seems to have stalled: @honza, do you concur > this may be a bug in GCC? If so shall I file something, or are you happy to > capture it appropriately?

[Bug gas/19880] gas/config/tc-arm.c:12519 error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions

2016-03-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19880 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/19880] gas/config/tc-arm.c:12519 error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions

2016-03-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19880 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c6025a80cc284ae2781278de6f44c672d5077797 commit c6025a80cc284ae2781278de6f4

[Bug gas/19880] gas/config/tc-arm.c:12519 error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions

2016-03-30 Thread kieranbingham at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19880 Kieran Bingham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kieranbingham at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug gas/19880] gas/config/tc-arm.c:12519 error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions

2016-03-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19880 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug gold/19842] LTO build fails to write call address for weak symbol reference

2016-03-30 Thread matt at godbolt dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842 --- Comment #31 from Matt Godbolt --- Hi all, Just following up on this as it seems to have stalled: @honza, do you concur this may be a bug in GCC? If so shall I file something, or are you happy to capture it appropriately? Thanks, Matt --

[Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental

2016-03-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19872 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 9142 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9142&action=edit Proposed patch Hi Britton, Please could you try out this patch and let me know how you get on. Cheers

[Bug ld/18452] ld allows overlapping sections

2016-03-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug ld/18452] ld allows overlapping sections

2016-03-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452 --- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a87dd97a2098b7e18ff2574a4e81ae521ef7e6f2 commit a87dd97a2098b7e18ff2574a4e81