https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Emrich ---
(In reply to awson from comment #2)
> Created attachment 9045 [details]
> Keep .rdata_runtime_pseudo_reloc from being gc collected
Ok, that improves the situation a lot. I get a lot less failures than wi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19803
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9096|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19803
--- Comment #8 from martin.koegler at chello dot at ---
Created attachment 9106
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9106&action=edit
Patch V1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19721
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19803
--- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 9107
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9107&action=edit
Patch VII
Hi Martin,
I like the patch, but I have one question: why did you need to use xstrdup to
make
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Emrich ---
Hi Nick,
Am 18.03.2016 um 17:07 schrieb Rainer Emrich:
> Am 18.03.2016 um 12:49 schrieb nickc at redhat dot com:
>> Would you mind trying out patch VII in PR 19803 and see if that makes a
>> difference ?
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807
--- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #24)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #23)
> > (In reply to Richard Guenther from comment #20)
> > > Hum, so we leave 2.26 broken?
> >
> > Please try users/hjl/pr19827/
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19803
--- Comment #10 from martin.koegler at chello dot at ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7)
> True - but it looks to me like the data structures for generating the export
> table are set up far too early - ie before garbage collection -
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19849
Bug ID: 19849
Summary: Solaris 11 as generated object incompatible with 2.26
objcopy "no group info for section" during GCC 5.3.0
gccgo build
Product: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19323
--- Comment #7 from Kushal Shah ---
Hi Alan,
I wanted to request you, if you could add the following information in the
Changelog to credit us for the discovery.
---
Th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Emrich ---
Hi Nick,
Am 18.03.2016 um 12:49 schrieb nickc at redhat dot com:
> Would you mind trying out patch VII in PR 19803 and see if that makes a
> difference ?
sure! But that's a little bit difficult now, at l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
Bug ID: 19842
Summary: LTO build fails to write call address for weak symbol
reference
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744
cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resoluti
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19803
--- Comment #12 from martin.koegler at chello dot at ---
Looks OK, but I have troubles applying it.
Additionally, there is 41f46ed9fea1a066de95b6a85c56393beef0b8b8 on master,
which looks like an earlier version.
I'll try to test it.
--
You
15 matches
Mail list logo
