[Bug ld/19805] visibility=hidden and .a fails

2016-03-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19805 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug gold/19794] src/gold/archive.cc: 2 * pointless copy ?

2016-03-10 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/19793] script-sections.cc:1475: possible redundant string copy ?

2016-03-10 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19793 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412

2016-03-10 Thread dgisselq at ieee dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19713 --- Comment #3 from Dan --- Comment on attachment 9084 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9084 Fix some places in the BFD library where octets vs bytes matter All of these changes look good. Is there an easy way that I c

[Bug ld/19805] New: visibility=hidden and .a fails

2016-03-10 Thread felix-glibc at fefe dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19805 Bug ID: 19805 Summary: visibility=hidden and .a fails Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assign

[Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412

2016-03-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19713 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug binutils/19801] c++filt cannot demangle _ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFSt4pairImjEjEZN5folly12addBenchmarkI3$_0EENSt9enable_ifIXeqsr5boost14function_types14function_arityIDTadsrT_onclEEE5valueLi2EEvE4

2016-03-10 Thread twoh at fb dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19801 --- Comment #2 from Taewook Oh --- Nick, Thank you for your reply. I'll forward the report to the maintainers. Best, Taewook On 3/10/16, 6:19 AM, "nickc at redhat dot com" wrote: >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__sour

[Bug gas/19744] Thumb-1 pcrop relocations don't work on Thumb-2 targets

2016-03-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a9f02af88d230aabf6771f94a6c401727a865188 commit a9f02af88d230aabf6771f94

[Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412

2016-03-10 Thread dgisselq at ieee dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19713 --- Comment #1 from Dan --- Created attachment 9083 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9083&action=edit A simple fix to this problem The enclosed patch should fix most all of the problems with bugs 19713, 19715, 19716, 1

[Bug ld/19796] dynamic relocation missing simbol

2016-03-10 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19796 Rafael Ávila de Espíndola changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resoluti

[Bug ld/19796] dynamic relocation missing simbol

2016-03-10 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19796 --- Comment #2 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola --- How does the dynamic handle this? A R_X86_64_TPOFF64 with no symbol is just the start of the thread block of the dso it is in? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug binutils/19801] c++filt cannot demangle _ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFSt4pairImjEjEZN5folly12addBenchmarkI3$_0EENSt9enable_ifIXeqsr5boost14function_types14function_arityIDTadsrT_onclEEE5valueLi2EEvE4

2016-03-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19801 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/19796] dynamic relocation missing simbol

2016-03-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19796 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are rece

[Bug ld/19796] dynamic relocation missing simbol

2016-03-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19796 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Wh

[Bug ld/19531] ld fails to build proper executables in several cases on x64_64-w64-mingw32

2016-03-10 Thread ismail at i10z dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531 Ismail Donmez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ismail at i10z dot com -- You are re

[Bug ld/19480] [2.26.51 regression] ld creates wrong output for libstdc++6.dll for mingw32 (32-bit)

2016-03-10 Thread ismail at i10z dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19480 Ismail Donmez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ismail at i10z dot com -- You are re

[Bug ld/19803] gc-sections breaks PE DLL variable export

2016-03-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19803 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1