I have configure binutils with follow configruation:
../binutils-2.25/configure --prefix=$CROSS_TOOL --target=$TARGET
--with-sysroot=$SYSROOT
#$CROSS_TOOL=/sig/cross-tool $TARGET=x86_64-none-linux-gnu
$HOST=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu $SYSROOT=/sig/sysroot -the directory
/sig/sysroot is
hi，
I’m newer. I found that symbols list results are different by using nm tool
for binutils-2.24 and binutils-2.22. I see some sourcecode difference between
binutils-2.24 and binutils-2.22, but have no idea of different sorting results
for nm.
The scene is as following:
1、The environment var
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12376
--- Comment #15 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7bcc503f3ef52fcac0d9be31f1b82440ec7ed2ff
commit 7bcc503f3ef52fcac0d9be31f1b8244
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19579
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9060|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19579
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[Regression] link error |[Regression] link error
|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19579
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9059|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19579
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> Created attachment 9059 [details]
> A patch
>
> Please try this patch.
Doesn't work:
[hjl@gnu-6 pr19579]$ cat x.c
#include
int foo[1];
int bar[1];
extern int *foo_p
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19579
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9033|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19579
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|s390x-linux-gnu |
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739
--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=523f4c9234439fd6ccc0dd2c3b387331dd64c54b
commit 523f4c9234439fd6ccc0dd2c3b38733
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Monat ---
Hi Charles,
We did not design these relocations to be usable in T2, indeed, since in
that case the movt/movw instructions fill the bill.
Besides the test case, would there be a strong reason to actua
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19579
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> I can reproduce it on Fedora 23. It is a bug in redhat-rpm-config, which
> has redhat-hardened-cc1 and redhat-hardened-ld. But there is no
> redhat-hardened-f951
12 matches
Mail list logo
