[Bug gas/19576] bogus code generation with on SunOS with 2.26

2016-02-05 Thread richard at netbsd dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19576 --- Comment #1 from Richard PALO --- Created attachment 8959 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8959&action=edit the respective gas output file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/19576] New: bogus code generation with on SunOS with 2.26

2016-02-05 Thread richard at netbsd dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19576 Bug ID: 19576 Summary: bogus code generation with on SunOS with 2.26 Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: ga

[Bug gold/19472] [aarch64] Large shared objects need pc-relative stubs or relocations for absolute stubs

2016-02-05 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19472 Han Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

OCTETS_PER_BYTE and Gas

2016-02-05 Thread Dan
To those who maintain the GNU assembler, thank you. I am currently working on a back-end implementation of the assembler to an embedded system where OCTETS_PER_BYTE=4. From a C standpoint, you might think of it as a system where sizeof(char)==sizeof(int), and both are 32-bits. The embedded syste

[Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check

2016-02-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19567 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #9) > > My test here doesn't follow any programming model and is independent of > > x32 or x86-64: > > > > [hjl@gnu-6 pr19567]$ cat x.s > > .globl _start > > _start:

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-05 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug ld/19541] Format reader for ILF format (used by MSVC-generated import libraries) does not properly handle data imports

2016-02-05 Thread njs at pobox dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541 --- Comment #5 from Nathaniel J. Smith --- Can the test suite include binary files? Two tests I can think of would be: 1) Include the ILF file; run objdump on it; confirm that the appropriate symbols appear. 2) Include the ILF file + a regul

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c34c98ed62f7f01fa19b1cfb174df942ee47127d commit c34c98ed62f7f01fa19b1cfb174

[Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check

2016-02-05 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19567 --- Comment #9 from Cary Coutant --- > My test here doesn't follow any programming model and is independent of > x32 or x86-64: > > [hjl@gnu-6 pr19567]$ cat x.s > .globl _start > _start: > mov $_start,%rax > mov _start,%rax > [hjl

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=44803b5d876fcbbc1c6d9919a1b763679d5c035f commit 44803b5d876fcbbc1c6d9919a1b

[Bug binutils/19437] ld segmentation fault

2016-02-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19437 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #3

Re: binutils 2.25.1 creates big sparse files

2016-02-05 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Joakim, > When building small libs/exec on ppc32 I usally get sparse files like so: > binutils 2.25.1 doing in this commit: > (Set ppc COMMONPAGESIZE to 64k) > > This is a huge problem as these sparse file are packaged into a > tar file and when unpacked they lose the sparse attribute and wil

[Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check

2016-02-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19567 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #7) > > [hjl@gnu-6 pr19567]$ cat x.s > > .globl _start > > _start: > > mov $_start,%rax > > mov _start,%rax > > [hjl@gnu-6 pr19567]$ make > > as --x32 -o x.o x

[Bug ld/19572] New: -Ttext-segment accepts out of range value

2016-02-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19572 Bug ID: 19572 Summary: -Ttext-segment accepts out of range value Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: l

[Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd

2016-02-05 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19571 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd

2016-02-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19571 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Markus, > I don't think it makes any sense to fuzz the demangler with arbitrary binary > files. The tools (nm, objdump) should be able to cope though. When I tried running nm for example I received th

[Bug ld/19541] Format reader for ILF format (used by MSVC-generated import libraries) does not properly handle data imports

2016-02-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd

2016-02-05 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19571 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot de -

[Bug gas/19556] GNURX toolchain generates incorrect opcode for "mov.b #0xff, [r0]" instruction.

2016-02-05 Thread vinay.g at kpit dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19556 --- Comment #4 from vinay kumar --- Hi Nick, Thanks for your feedback I will work on this bug. Regards, Vinay -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug

[Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd

2016-02-05 Thread boehme.marcel at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19571 --- Comment #3 from Marcel Böhme --- Hi Nick, Sure. I'll send the bug report to the gcc bugzilla. The bug can be triggered with: objdump -x -C nm -C I detected the bug with a modified version of the AFL Fuzzer w/out sanitization. -- You

[Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd

2016-02-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19571 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd

2016-02-05 Thread boehme.marcel at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19571 --- Comment #1 from Marcel Böhme --- Created attachment 8957 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8957&action=edit Test Case #2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug binutils/19571] New: Buffer Overflow in libbfd

2016-02-05 Thread boehme.marcel at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19571 Bug ID: 19571 Summary: Buffer Overflow in libbfd Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug gas/19556] GNURX toolchain generates incorrect opcode for "mov.b #0xff, [r0]" instruction.

2016-02-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19556 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #3