[Bug ld/12548] anonymous version scripts no longer working with binutils 2.21

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12548 Nikita Baksalyar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nikita.baksalyar at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/19383] strip generates section names in wrong order

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19383 Fi Zixer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/19383] strip generates section names in wrong order

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19383 --- Comment #2 from Fi Zixer --- Not a bug. shstrtab string are accessed by offsets (first field in sht entries). Closing now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug binutils/19383] strip generates section names in wrong order

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19383 --- Comment #1 from Fi Zixer --- Bug confirmed in strip 2.25 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://l

[Bug binutils/19383] strip generates section names in wrong order

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19383 Fi Zixer changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.24|2.25 -- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug binutils/19383] New: strip generates section names in wrong order

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19383 Bug ID: 19383 Summary: strip generates section names in wrong order Product: binutils Version: 2.24 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binut

[Bug gas/19381] Warn on instructions accessing small memory addresses, to catch un-tagged immediates

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19381 --- Comment #1 from Josh Triplett --- (In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #0) > less than 4096 (0x3ff) Half-edited sentence there; s/0x3ff/0x1000/, obviously. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _