[Bug binutils/15835] binutils can't deal with more than one SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section (such as from Solaris or illumos link editor)

2015-09-21 Thread richard at netbsd dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15835 --- Comment #18 from Richard PALO --- great, both greadelf and gobjdump seem fine with libxul.so now -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils ma

[Bug gold/18989] New: please enable --push-state / --pop-state for gold

2015-09-21 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18989 Bug ID: 18989 Summary: please enable --push-state / --pop-state for gold Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Bug binutils/15835] binutils can't deal with more than one SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section (such as from Solaris or illumos link editor)

2015-09-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15835 --- Comment #17 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Richard, > are all these sim/* bits applicable or by accident they are included? Accident - sorry ! Also there is a bug in the patch to the bfd/elf32-rl78.c file, (fixed locally), but this will only

[Bug binutils/15835] binutils can't deal with more than one SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section (such as from Solaris or illumos link editor)

2015-09-21 Thread richard at netbsd dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15835 --- Comment #16 from Richard PALO --- Comment on attachment 8625 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8625 Extended patch are all these sim/* bits applicable or by accident they are included? -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug binutils/15835] binutils can't deal with more than one SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section (such as from Solaris or illumos link editor)

2015-09-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15835 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #8510|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gas/17505] arm: bad static label resolution from different modes

2015-09-21 Thread chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17505 Christian Bruel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/18759] R_OR1K_*_PCREL should have pcrel_offset=TRUE

2015-09-21 Thread whitequark at whitequark dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18759 whitequark at whitequark dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #8474|0 |1 is obsolet

[Bug binutils/18759] R_OR1K_*_PCREL should have pcrel_offset=TRUE

2015-09-21 Thread whitequark at whitequark dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18759 --- Comment #10 from whitequark at whitequark dot org --- Ok, I took a shot at fixing gas today. To recap... Here is the minimal testcase: .section .data1 .long 0 x: .long 0 .section .data2 .long 0 .long 0 y: .long (x-