[Bug binutils/15835] binutils can't deal with more than one SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section (such as from Solaris or illumos link editor)

2015-09-08 Thread richard at netbsd dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15835 --- Comment #12 from Richard PALO --- they are quite large: > $ gls -sh pr15835.libxuls.tar.bz2 > 676M pr15835.libxuls.tar.bz2 can I copy them somewhere in particular? I could also do one at a time which is half the size. -- You are receiv

[Bug binutils/15835] binutils can't deal with more than one SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section (such as from Solaris or illumos link editor)

2015-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15835 --- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Richard, (In reply to Richard PALO from comment #10) > I can provide both libxul.so, yes please - that would definitely help. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug binutils/18879] general protection fault in readelf (byte_get_little_endian(elfcomm.c:149))

2015-09-08 Thread fweimer at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18879 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fweimer at redhat dot com

[Bug gold/18935] New: Gold assert fail when moving dot in NOLOAD section.

2015-09-08 Thread johan.karlsson at enea dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18935 Bug ID: 18935 Summary: Gold assert fail when moving dot in NOLOAD section. Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

Re: Off-by-one error in ld documentation

2015-09-08 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Hans-Peter, Nicely, thanks. While there's a point in keeping just one version for simplicity, the educational point of "here's what you may write which doesn't work, here's the semantically corrected code, and this is what you should have written in the first place" wins, IMHO. Good. I ha