Patch to add preliminary support for Bitrig/amd64

2015-09-03 Thread Sevan Janiyan
Hi, Attached patch adds preliminary support for Bitrig to binutils. The patch only covers x86 support (Bitrig is a fork of OpenBSD specifically targeted at amd64 & arm). These are the minimal changes need to build binutils (tested on v2.25) with gold linker enabled. I'm not subscribed to this lis

Re: Patch to add preliminary support for Bitrig/amd64

2015-09-03 Thread Sevan Janiyan
On 03/09/2015 20:36, Sevan Janiyan wrote: > happy to answer any question/test/amend changes. I've raised a bug in bugzilla, sorry about the noise. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18920 ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org

[Bug binutils/18920] New: Add preliminary support for Bitrig/amd64

2015-09-03 Thread venture37 at geeklan dot co.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18920 Bug ID: 18920 Summary: Add preliminary support for Bitrig/amd64 Product: binutils Version: 2.26 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bi

Patch to add preliminary support for Bitrig/amd64

2015-09-03 Thread Sevan Janiyan
Hi, Attached patch adds preliminary support for Bitrig to binutils. The patch only covers x86 support (Bitrig is a fork of OpenBSD specifically targeted at amd64 & arm). These are the minimal changes need to build binutils (tested on v2.25) without the gold linker enabled. happy to answer any que

Re: Off-by-one error in ld documentation

2015-09-03 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Mark, In ld/ld.texinfo, the following example code is offered: start_of_ROM = .ROM; end_of_ROM = .ROM + sizeof (.ROM) - 1; start_of_FLASH = .FLASH; Then the C source code to perform the copy would be: extern char start_of_ROM, end_of_ROM, start_of_FLASH; memcpy (& start_o

[Bug ld/18899] sha1.c:324 sanitizer runtime error: load of misaligned address 0x62f00011847e for type 'const sha1_uint32', which requires 4 byte alignment

2015-09-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18899 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/18882] readelf computes undefined expression (long int) 1 << 63

2015-09-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18882 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/18879] general protection fault in readelf (byte_get_little_endian(elfcomm.c:149))

2015-09-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18879 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1a9155522d3d1f6aded1178ad7038e846b6d67ba commit 1a9155522d3d1f6aded1178ad70

[Bug binutils/18879] general protection fault in readelf (byte_get_little_endian(elfcomm.c:149))

2015-09-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18879 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/18879] general protection fault in readelf (byte_get_little_endian(elfcomm.c:149))

2015-09-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18879 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug binutils/15835] binutils can't deal with more than one SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section (such as from Solaris or illumos link editor)

2015-09-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15835 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Nick Clif

[Bug binutils/15835] binutils can't deal with more than one SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section (such as from Solaris or illumos link editor)

2015-09-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15835 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 8575 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8575&action=edit Alternative patch for the 2.25 sources -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for t

Off-by-one error in ld documentation

2015-09-03 Thread Mark Rages
In ld/ld.texinfo, the following example code is offered: > start_of_ROM = .ROM; > end_of_ROM = .ROM + sizeof (.ROM) - 1; > start_of_FLASH = .FLASH; > > Then the C source code to perform the copy would be: > > extern char start_of_ROM, end_of_ROM, start_of_FLASH; > > memcpy (& start_of_F

[Bug ld/18914] New: Shared lib created using static libs and "-Wl,--exclude-libs,ALL" export uninitialized variables

2015-09-03 Thread johan.bolmsjo at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18914 Bug ID: 18914 Summary: Shared lib created using static libs and "-Wl,--exclude-libs,ALL" export uninitialized variables Product: binutils Version: 2.25