Re: Bug in php from `yum install php`

On 07 Aug 2015 17:03, Kristopher Windsor wrote: > Hope I have the right mailing list. sorry, but this list is unrelated to yum or php or centos. you probably should post to some centos forums/lists instead. -mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature __

Bug in php from `yum install php`

Hi, Hope I have the right mailing list. I found what appears to be a PHP bug on CentOS 6.6 and originally posted it here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31850528/perl-exec-usr-bin-php-v-hangs-on-centos-6-6-unless-stdin-is-closed-first I noticed that while php from `yum install php` has this

[Bug gold/18788] New: Crash in gold::Output_section_element_input::set_section_addresses

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18788 Bug ID: 18788 Summary: Crash in gold::Output_section_element_input::set_section_addres ses Product: binutils Version: 2.26 (HEAD) Status: NEW

[Bug binutils/18785] strip is broken

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18785 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/18785] strip is broken

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18785 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d4ac1f878ecef58f1e4b4ff0cbfb4b475656eaf4 commit d4ac1f878ecef58f1e4b4ff0cbfb4b47

[Bug binutils/18785] strip is broken

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18785 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 8494 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8494&action=edit A testcase [hjl@gnu-6 pr18785]$ make /bin/strip compare-elim.o -o good.o ./strip compare-elim.o -o bad.o cmp good

[Bug binutils/18785] strip is broken

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18785 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|objdump is broken |strip is broken -- You are receiving this

[Bug binutils/18785] objdump is broken

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18785 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receivi

[Bug binutils/18785] New: objdump is broken

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18785 Bug ID: 18785 Summary: objdump is broken Product: binutils Version: 2.26 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assign

[Bug ld/18720] No symbol version section for versioned symbol `foo@FOO'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18720 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/18720] No symbol version section for versioned symbol `foo@FOO'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18720 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6e33951edcbed1fd803beabcde2af3b252b92164 commit 6e33951edcbed1fd803beabcde2af3b2

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #12 from David Abdurachmanov --- For the record, the patch for "-Wl,--defsym=foo=0x8000" fix is here (already approved): https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-07/msg00210.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You a

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #11 from David Abdurachmanov --- I tested it in the last couple of days and it worked fine. Details on GCC bugzilla: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC li