https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #28 from Yuhang Wang ---
The system gcc version is 4.4. I will try again tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Yuhang Wang from comment #26)
> I just disabled multi-lib. Here is the config command I used to build
> gcc-4.9.2:
>
What is your system GCC? Have you tried it on binutils?
--
You are receiving
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #26 from Yuhang Wang ---
I just disabled multi-lib. Here is the config command I used to build
gcc-4.9.2:
../gcc-4.9.2/configure --prefix=/Scr/scr-test-steven/install/gcc/4.9.2
--disable-multilib --with-gmp=/Scr/scr-test-steven/in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
How did you configure GCC 4.9.2? Did you make any changes to GCC 4.9.2?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutil
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #24 from Yuhang Wang ---
Created attachment 8480
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8480&action=edit
ld/ld.log for the latest master branch of binutils
I forgot to attach the ld.log. Here it is.
--
You are r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Yuhang Wang from comment #22)
> Created attachment 8479 [details]
> log file for `make check` after compiling the master branch of binutils
>
What is in ld.log?
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #22 from Yuhang Wang ---
Created attachment 8479
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8479&action=edit
log file for `make check` after compiling the master branch of binutils
Here is config command:
../binutils-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #21 from Yuhang Wang ---
Hi,
I have compiled the master branch of the binutils. Here is the log file for
`make check`. I sill got many errors for ld. Do you think they are significant
or can be ignored?
=== ld Sum
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Yuhang Wang from comment #18)
> Hi H. J. Lu,
>
> Thanks. I cloned the master branch. This new version seems to require python
> and I got some errors related to PyUnicodeUCS4_Decode (see attached
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #19 from Yuhang Wang ---
Created attachment 8478
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8478&action=edit
results of make when building the lastest master branch of binutils
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #18 from Yuhang Wang ---
Hi H. J. Lu,
Thanks. I cloned the master branch. This new version seems to require python
and I got some errors related to PyUnicodeUCS4_Decode (see attached log). Any
suggestions on how to fix it?
Yuhan
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18768
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Vereschaka
---
Created attachment 8477
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8477&action=edit
Code example to reproduce the bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18768
Bug ID: 18768
Summary: internal error in do_sized_write at ehframe.cc:170
when merging eh_frame/eh_frame_hdr using ld script
Product: binutils
Version: 2.25
Status: NE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Yuhang Wang from comment #16)
> Hi H. J. Lu,
>
> Could you tell me how to get binutils-2.26? I couldn't find it on the
> release page: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/
The master branch will be
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #16 from Yuhang Wang ---
Hi H. J. Lu,
Could you tell me how to get binutils-2.26? I couldn't find it on the release
page: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/
Yuhang
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #15 from Yuhang Wang ---
Created attachment 8475
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8475&action=edit
ld.log after using the new site.exp with DEJAGNU env variable pointing to it
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #14 from Yuhang Wang ---
Hi Nick,
The zlib I mentioned is already in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Here is the result of
"echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH":
/Scr/scr-test-steven/install/gcc/4.9.2/lib64:/Scr/scr-test-steven/install/gcc/4.9.2/lib:/Scr/
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
FWIW, since the in-tree zlib is enabled on master branch, this
problem will go away automatically with binutils 2.26.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18765
Bug ID: 18765
Summary: gas/config/tc-arm.c: result of ‘15 << 28’ requires 33
bits to represent, but ‘int’ only has 32 bits
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Statu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18764
Bug ID: 18764
Summary: arm.cc:4495: error: Reloc_stub::Key::name() const
defined but not used
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: no
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18763
Bug ID: 18763
Summary: dirsearch.cc: Dir_caches::~Dir_caches()’ defined but
not used
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18741
--- Comment #3 from markus.eisenmann at gmx dot at ---
Sorry!
Forget my last comment about the sub-section size;
as in
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0044e/IHI0044E_aaelf.pdf
described, the sub-section size includes the si
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #12 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Yuhang,
You need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH rather than LDFLAGS in order to locate
libraries when executables are run. So what you need to do is to either set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your environment, or els
23 matches
Mail list logo
