https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18750
Yuriy Kaminskiy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8471|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18750
--- Comment #9 from Tyler Hicks ---
Comment on attachment 8471
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8471
Fix incorrect escape sequence on platform with signed char (v4)
No problem!
This patch looks good but I wonder why yo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18750
Yuriy Kaminskiy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8470|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18750
--- Comment #7 from Tyler Hicks ---
(In reply to Yuriy Kaminskiy from comment #6)
> Created attachment 8470 [details]
> Fix incorrect escape sequence on platform with signed char (v3)
>
> ... and similar bug (but just incorrect output, withou
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18750
Yuriy Kaminskiy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8469|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18750
--- Comment #5 from Tyler Hicks ---
Yes, but srec.c gets it right by storing the bytes in an unsigned char instead
of a signed one. I now think that ihex.c should also have this change, as well:
diff --git a/bfd/ihex.c b/bfd/ihex.c
index 8e66
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18750
Yuriy Kaminskiy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8468|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18750
Yuriy Kaminskiy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yumkam+binutils at gmail dot
com
-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #11 from Yuhang Wang ---
Hi Nick,
I have add "LDFLAGS=-L/Scr/scr-test-steven/install/zlib/1.2.8/lib" during the
configuration phase and the Makefile under ld/ folder is also updated with a
new LDFLAGS:
LDFLAGS = -static-libstdc++
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #10 from Yuhang Wang ---
Created attachment 8467
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8467&action=edit
ld/ld.log after adding LDFLAGS and run the "make check" again
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18750
--- Comment #2 from Tyler Hicks ---
I've requested that a CVE be assigned for this issue:
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/31/6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18750
--- Comment #1 from Tyler Hicks ---
Created attachment 8466
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8466&action=edit
Fix stack buffer overflow when printing bad bytes in Intel Hex objects
Here's a proposed patch to fix this bu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18750
Bug ID: 18750
Summary: Stack buffer overflow when printing bad bytes in Intel
Hex objects
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #9 from Yuhang Wang ---
Hi Nick,
I will compile again with zlib and let you know the results. Thank you for
pointing that out.
Yuhang
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Yuhang,
Have you looked in the log file yourself ? If you do, you will see that
about half of the failures are because the z library is missing. Eg:
/Scr/scr-test-steven/Programs/BinUtils/build_b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #7 from Yuhang Wang ---
Hi Nick,
I have uploaded the ld.log file. Please take a look. Thanks!
Yuhang
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #6 from Yuhang Wang ---
Created attachment 8464
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8464&action=edit
ld/ld.log file from the binutils compilation directory
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Yuhang,
> Do you think I should compile everything in the same folder as the source
> file
> instead?
No, that will not help.
Please could you upload the ld.log file from the failed tests, so that I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18747
Bug ID: 18747
Summary: src/bfd/coff-sh.c:2330: possible bad expression ?
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Comp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18741
--- Comment #1 from markus.eisenmann at gmx dot at ---
Debugging of BDF- and GAS-sources has shown following behavior:
With calling AS-option meabi=gnu there are now (ARM-) attributes;
I.e. size = 0 in function vendor_obj_attr_size() [bfd/elf-
20 matches
Mail list logo
