https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209
--- Comment #1 from dje at google dot com ---
I kinda wonder if the test should be reversed (in some sense, not blanketly).
If I'm dumping section contents, how often would I prefer to dump the
compressed form instead of the decompressed form?
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209
Bug ID: 18209
Summary: objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed
section names
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
--- Comment #3 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola ---
(In reply to Clément Péron from comment #2)
> Hi,
>
> Any Progress ?
>
> I made an ugly path to put each string in an unique section,
> .rodata.str1.__hash__
>
> it's working fin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18176
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0fad6e4b94e754e26e904bab074bf6c94d825711
commit 0fad6e4b94e754e26e904bab074bf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola cha
nged:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at gmail d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17902
Clément Péron changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peron.clem at gmail dot com
-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18189
--- Comment #6 from David Howells ---
Works for me, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://l
