[Bug gold/18147] gold should not issue relocation overflow error with --unresolved-symbols=ignore-all

2015-03-22 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18147 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- It might be reasonable to not report relocation overflow for strong undefined symbols, but I don't think that a linker should ignore all weak undefined symbol overflow. For example, this if (foo) foo (

[Bug gold/18106] error: TLS relocation against invalid instruction

2015-03-22 Thread ccoutant at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18106 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/18106] error: TLS relocation against invalid instruction

2015-03-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18106 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=152f702439a34bf20b74f472695490edb42ad56f commit 152f702439a34bf20b74f472695

[Bug gold/18106] error: TLS relocation against invalid instruction

2015-03-22 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18106 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #5) > Created attachment 8204 [details] > Proposed gold patch > > HJ, can you try this patch? I think it should work, but I'm at home right > now, and my Ubuntu VM doesn't

[Bug gold/18106] error: TLS relocation against invalid instruction

2015-03-22 Thread ccoutant at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18106 --- Comment #5 from Cary Coutant --- Created attachment 8204 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8204&action=edit Proposed gold patch HJ, can you try this patch? I think it should work, but I'm at home right now, and my Ub