https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17639
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17639
--- Comment #4 from Peter Wu ---
Verified with master (git commit c924eb67e143722e4098d84c1cb91123a51c988f).
The current binutils stable is 2.24 right? It would be nice if it available in
the next version (2.25?). Thank you for the prompt res
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17639
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17639
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16496
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.26
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16496
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17644
Bug ID: 17644
Summary: Optimize out i386/x86-64 JUMP_SLOT relocation
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Componen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17639
Arun Sharma changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@sharma-home.net
--
You are receiv
