[Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807 --- Comment #5 from Angelo Graziosi --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4) > Hi Angelo, Hi Corinna, > > Please could you try out the uploaded patch. > > I think that it should work for this particular test case, but I also > thi

[Bug gas/16722] arm: literal pool syntax for vldr is broken

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16722 Jiong. Wang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wong.kwongyuan at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 7550 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7550&action=edit Proposed patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Nick Clif

[Bug ld/16835] PE/COFF: __image_base__ and __ImageBase have different values

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16835 --- Comment #1 from Corinna Vinschen --- Hang on. My patch changes the value of __ImageBase inside of ld, but in the resulting DLL it's still the old default value. I don't see why this happens :( Sorry, Corinna -- You are receiving this

[Bug ld/16835] New: PE/COFF: __image_base__ and __ImageBase have different values

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16835 Bug ID: 16835 Summary: PE/COFF: __image_base__ and __ImageBase have different values Product: binutils Version: 2.25 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/16821] x86_64 PE/COFF: ld truncates addresses of symbols from linker scripts to 32 bit

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16821 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug ld/16787] LD gives wrong error messages

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16787 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #10) > Sorry, but I still canont reproduce this failure. :-( > > H.J. - your test case does not demonstrated the problem, at least as far as > I can see. It shows the li

[Bug ld/16821] x86_64 PE/COFF: ld truncates addresses of symbols from linker scripts to 32 bit

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16821 Corinna Vinschen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at redhat dot com --- Comme

[Bug ld/16821] x86_64 PE/COFF: ld truncates addresses of symbols from linker scripts to 32 bit

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16821 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Corinna, > Well, I'm wondering if ld couldn't utilize the fact that executables > are never bigger than 2 Gigs. I'm not entirely sure, but afaik the > relocation information is signed. Couldn't __imag

[Bug ld/16833] New: ld refuses to mix ordered and unordered sections

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16833 Bug ID: 16833 Summary: ld refuses to mix ordered and unordered sections Product: binutils Version: 2.24 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: l

[Bug ld/16787] LD gives wrong error messages

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16787 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Nick Cli