[Bug gold/16085] gold assumes STT_NOTYPE symbols are not thumb

2013-10-25 Thread ccoutant at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16085 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|ian at air

[Bug gold/16085] gold assumes STT_NOTYPE symbols are not thumb

2013-10-25 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16085 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 7256 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7256&action=edit more complete version of the patch from comment 1 more complete version of the patch from comment 1 assert

[Bug gold/16085] gold assumes STT_NOTYPE symbols are not thumb

2013-10-25 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16085 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug gold/16085] gold assumes STT_NOTYPE symbols are not thumb

2013-10-25 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16085 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- - fail saying it cannot handle this relocation. Which could look something like this: ... Index: gold/arm.cc === --- gold/arm.cc (revision 42

[Bug gold/16085] New: gold assumes STT_NOTYPE symbols are not thumb

2013-10-25 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16085 Bug ID: 16085 Summary: gold assumes STT_NOTYPE symbols are not thumb Product: binutils Version: 2.25 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Componen

Re: Differing archives on http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/ and ftp://sourceware.org/pub/binutils/releases/

2013-10-25 Thread nick clifton
Hi Bernhard, Projects like Freetz http://freetz.org/ or OpenWrt http://openwrt.org build customized firmware for DSL modems or router. The build systems require old versions of binutils suitable for old kernel or uClibc versions. An update is not possible due to closed source kernel modules and

[Bug binutils/16083] objdump provides wrong disassemble for MULSD instruction when used with an unusual combination of prefixes

2013-10-25 Thread yulyugin at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083 --- Comment #2 from Evgeny --- (In reply to Grigory Rechistov from comment #1) > The problem is present not just for MULSD but for many x86 instructions that > are encoded with a mandatory prefix (e.g. 0xF2), but also are allowed to > have opt

[Bug binutils/16083] objdump provides wrong disassemble for MULSD instruction when used with an unusual combination of prefixes

2013-10-25 Thread grigory.rechistov at phystech dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083 Grigory Rechistov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||grigory.rechistov@phystech.