[Bug binutils/14768] Checklist: Binutils Migration To Git

2013-08-19 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14768 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #11 f

[Bug ld/11539] ld --gc-sections should work for PE-COFF on MinGW

2013-08-19 Thread damian at veritymedical dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11539 Damian Kaczmarek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at veritymedical dot com ---

[Bug binutils/14768] Checklist: Binutils Migration To Git

2013-08-19 Thread fred.cooke+nospam at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14768 --- Comment #10 from Fred --- OK, fair enough! As you were :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https:/

[Bug binutils/14768] Checklist: Binutils Migration To Git

2013-08-19 Thread tromey at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14768 --- Comment #9 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Fred from comment #8) > About the last comment, though: Anything that disrupts current Git users > should probably be avoided. Get it into Git, sure, but why not just leave it > on a branch calle

[Bug gold/14342] [gold] symbol 'std::__once_callable' used as both __thread and non-__thread

2013-08-19 Thread ccoutant at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14342 --- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant --- >> Are you using a recent version of gold? I think the TLS problem should >> have been fixed with this patch: >> >> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2013-06/msg00139.html > > This indeed looks like exac

[Bug binutils/14768] Checklist: Binutils Migration To Git

2013-08-19 Thread fred.cooke+nospam at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14768 --- Comment #8 from Fred --- Tom, I've been reading your updates to this, and enjoying seeing progress! :-) About the last comment, though: Anything that disrupts current Git users should probably be avoided. Get it into Git, sure, but why not

[Bug binutils/14768] Checklist: Binutils Migration To Git

2013-08-19 Thread tromey at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14768 --- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey --- Joseph pointed out that we want to stitch in the pre-sourceware CVS history, which is available: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-10/msg00407.html There are a few candidates for merging this in: 1. Wh