http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
--- Comment #6 from Jan Waclawek 2012-05-03 22:37:12
UTC ---
Hi Johann,
I think what you wrote there is a bit unfair.
The original bug report IMO contained everything needed to reproduce the bug
and to assess it as different from the "trampo
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #6388|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
--- Comment #5 from Jan Waclawek 2012-05-03 22:29:01
UTC ---
> Is using linker stubs supported without --relax at all?
While it is indeed possible to "administratively" suppress this bug by
disallowing stubs without --relax, I believe this bu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-03
22:03:18 UTC ---
Here is a reduced example:
; == foo.ss ==
.text
K1: nop
.space 0x1fff6
K2: nop
.section .progmem, "a", @progbits
.word gs(K1)
.word gs(K2)
== Assemble ==
$ avr-as -mmcu=
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-03
21:57:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Please re-read [...] the post at the given link.
Please make bug reports that are self-contained.
If there is information missing to reproduce the i
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
--- Comment #2 from Jan Waclawek 2012-05-03 20:45:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> If you use such big programs, .trampolines gets shifted out of it's 128KiB
> section.
No, they don't; I posted relevant portions of disassembly in the lin
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13812
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||konfera at efton dot sk
--- Comment
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
Jan Waclawek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.weddington at atmel
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
Bug #: 14058
Summary: Internal overflow error, on >128kB FLASH with no
relaxation
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-03 13:47:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> HJ, you no doubt saw my attempt at trying to interpret the ELF spec to
> rationalize GNU ld generation of SHN_ABS symbols. Cary demolished my
> argument.
>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra 2012-05-03 13:01:21
UTC ---
HJ, you no doubt saw my attempt at trying to interpret the ELF spec to
rationalize GNU ld generation of SHN_ABS symbols. Cary demolished my argument.
So for one, my claim that there
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-03 12:35:04
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> HJ, your patch is cunning enough but really no better than reverting the
> pr13621 change, since your patch will likely result in elflint complaints
My patch a
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #8 from Jan Rękorajski 2012-05-03 10:25:44
UTC ---
Add lilo to the list of broken bootloaders...
HJ, your patch does the job, my kernel is deep into swap and running fine.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/use
14 matches
Mail list logo
