[Bug ld/13797] ld fails when building firefox?

2012-03-07 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13797 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug ld/10340] ld doesn't honor sysroot prefix for ldscripts

2012-03-07 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10340 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://sourceware.org/ml/bi

[Bug ld/10340] ld doesn't honor sysroot prefix for ldscripts

2012-03-07 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10340 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug ld/10340] ld doesn't honor sysroot prefix for ldscripts

2012-03-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10340 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-08 05:29:37 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2012-03-08 05:29:33 Modified files: ld : ChangeLog ldfile.c ldfile.h

[Bug ld/13817] Broken IFUNC support

2012-03-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13817 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-03-08 01:14:08 UTC --- So we have to use real function, not PLT entry for non-GOT reference to locally defined IFUNC symbols, at least on i386. Will revert: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-10/msg00203.

[Bug ld/13561] AIX link failure: RLD address not contained in section

2012-03-07 Thread ka5427-536 at online dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561 --- Comment #7 from Hans-Georg Thien 2012-03-07 22:01:13 UTC --- it would be great if someone could give me a hint on howto relate the failing addres of 0x1364 to the symbol in question so that I can try to debug the issue by myself. --

Re: error compiling binutils-2.22 with clang v2.9

2012-03-07 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Roy Batty writes: > i don't know if your project even has an interest in being compiled with > anything other than GCC @ this point in time, but here is an error I found > when trying to make binutils with clang.  note that this was performed on a > fairly standard fedora 16 x86_64-bit install

[Bug ld/13817] Broken IFUNC support

2012-03-07 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13817 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-07 10:24:56 UTC --- Created attachment 6264 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6264 ifunctest.tar.bz2 CC='gcc -m32' sh ./ifunc.sh LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./ifunc3 shows the segfault (the

[Bug ld/13817] New: Broken IFUNC support

2012-03-07 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13817 Bug #: 13817 Summary: Broken IFUNC support Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo:

Re: error compiling binutils-2.22 with clang v2.9

2012-03-07 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Mar 7, 2012, at 2:34 AM, Roy Batty wrote: > To Whom It May Concern: > > i don't know if your project even has an interest in being compiled with > anything other than GCC @ this point in time, but here is an error I found > when trying to make binutils with clang. note that this was perfor

error compiling binutils-2.22 with clang v2.9

2012-03-07 Thread Roy Batty
To Whom It May Concern: i don't know if your project even has an interest in being compiled with anything other than GCC @ this point in time, but here is an error I found when trying to make binutils with clang.  note that this was performed on a fairly standard fedora 16 x86_64-bit install (