binutils 2.16.1a contains directory 2.16.1

2011-09-26 Thread Björn Stenberg
It would be nice if the filename matched the content. It seems this is solved with a symlink on ftp.gnu.org for most other versions, but not 2.16.1. Possibly the same issue applies to 2.15. -- Björn ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org

Re: binutils-2.21.53 bugs

2011-09-26 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Sep 26, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Tristan, > >> I think that currently we always use i18n macro _("xx") for all our strings >> - or we are supposed to. >> As you have noticed, this is sometimes useless, particularly when the string >> is not subject to >> translation. >> >

Re: binutils-2.21.53 bugs

2011-09-26 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Tristan, I think that currently we always use i18n macro _("xx") for all our strings - or we are supposed to. As you have noticed, this is sometimes useless, particularly when the string is not subject to translation. Maintainers, must we not use _() macro for non-translatable string ? I

Re: binutils-2.21.53 bugs

2011-09-26 Thread Tristan Gingold
Hi, first thank you for this extensive review. I think that currently we always use i18n macro _("xx") for all our strings - or we are supposed to. As you have noticed, this is sometimes useless, particularly when the string is not subject to translation. Maintainers, must we not use _() macro

[Bug gas/13224] New: gcc 4.6.1 compilation issue on config/obj-elf.c : "clone" function with the default config -Werror=shadow,

2011-09-26 Thread dark_footix at yahoo dot fr
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13224 Bug #: 13224 Summary: gcc 4.6.1 compilation issue on config/obj-elf.c : "clone" function with the default config -Werror=shadow, Product: binutils Version: 2.2