[Bug gas/12854] ARM: Nonsensical argument shift specifications accepted for LSL/LSR/ASR/ROR mnemonics

2011-06-10 Thread dave.martin at linaro dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12854 --- Comment #6 from Dave Martin 2011-06-10 17:25:09 UTC --- On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:13:41PM +, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12854 > > --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton 2011-06-10 > 15

[Bug ld/12570] .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame

2011-06-10 Thread jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12570 --- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil 2011-06-10 16:00:13 UTC --- RFC: Unwind info for PLT http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-06/msg00064.html From: Jakub Jelinek -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -

[Bug gold/12804] Incremental link tests failed

2011-06-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gas/12854] ARM: Nonsensical argument shift specifications accepted for LSL/LSR/ASR/ROR mnemonics

2011-06-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12854 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5780|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gas/12854] ARM: Nonsensical argument shift specifications accepted for LSL/LSR/ASR/ROR mnemonics

2011-06-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12854 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton 2011-06-10 15:13:06 UTC --- Hi Dave, Revised patch uploaded. This one even contains a testcase! Happy now ? :-) Cheers Nick -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug gas/12854] ARM: Nonsensical argument shift specifications accepted for LSL/LSR/ASR/ROR mnemonics

2011-06-10 Thread dave.martin at linaro dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12854 --- Comment #3 from Dave Martin 2011-06-10 09:05:04 UTC --- On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:53:40PM +, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > Please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it works for > you. > > Cheers > Nick