[Bug binutils/12807] OBJCOPY from ELF to COFF changes relocation type from 32 to 16 bits

2011-05-26 Thread ee at la dot mine.nu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807 --- Comment #2 from Emil 2011-05-27 01:23:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > objcopy decides to change the R_386_32 type into type "1" - 16 bits > (instead of "6" - 32 bits). The PE format doesn't handle 16 bit relocations > so when you li

[Bug binutils/12807] OBJCOPY from ELF to COFF changes relocation type from 32 to 16 bits

2011-05-26 Thread ee at la dot mine.nu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807 --- Comment #1 from Emil 2011-05-27 01:21:02 UTC --- Created attachment 5755 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5755 Patcher for COFF files produced by OBJCOPY rename the executable to patchcoff for patching, otherwise it w

[Bug gold/12804] Incremental link tests failed

2011-05-26 Thread ccoutant at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804 --- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant 2011-05-26 18:53:13 UTC --- HJ, now that patch 16 is committed, can you check to see if these failures are gone? Before the patch, in my configuration (gcc 4.4), the tests were clean at -O0 -g, but incremental_

[Bug ld/12809] R_X86_64_TPOFF64 isn't handled properly

2011-05-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12809 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ld/12809] R_X86_64_TPOFF64 isn't handled properly

2011-05-26 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12809 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-26 13:22:08 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:h...@sourceware.org2011-05-26 13:22:05 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elf64-x86-64.c

[Bug ld/12808] Segfault in _bfd_elf_merge_symbol

2011-05-26 Thread kmtaylor at gmx dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12808 --- Comment #4 from Kim Taylor 2011-05-26 13:19:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > %A and %B are always processed first. Ahhh, yes you are right. %As and %Bs get caught by _bfd_default_error_handler then anything remaining gets sent to vfp

[Bug ld/12808] Segfault in _bfd_elf_merge_symbol

2011-05-26 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12808 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ld/12808] Segfault in _bfd_elf_merge_symbol

2011-05-26 Thread kmtaylor at gmx dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12808 Kim Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID