http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12402
--- Comment #3 from Dave Korn 2011-02-01 07:03:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > > GCC lto/plugin support is currently broken on this target.
> >
> > Is there else anything apart from GCC PR47274, which I'm looking at?
>
> There's ab
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12402
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-02-01 04:30:04 UTC ---
> > GCC lto/plugin support is currently broken on this target.
>
> Is there else anything apart from GCC PR47274, which I'm looking at?
There's about three hundr
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12402
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12451
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton 2011-01-31 10:29:07
UTC ---
Hi Jakub,
> Actually, it seems upstream binutils probably never handled it right and it
> seems Fedora had some local patch for it that got dropped as redundant when it
> actually h
