[Bug ld/12380] Assertion in linker script failed twice

2011-01-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12380 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug gas/12390] binutils as accepts single '/' as if it were a comment

2011-01-11 Thread ojab at ojab dot ru
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12390 ojab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ojab at ojab dot ru -- Configure bugmail: http

[Bug ld/12391] New: compile not okay with 2.21.51.0.3 / .4 / .5 at ld/earmelf.c

2011-01-11 Thread niki.waibel at gmx dot net
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12391 Summary: compile not okay with 2.21.51.0.3 / .4 / .5 at ld/earmelf.c Product: binutils Version: 2.21 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Componen

[Bug gas/12390] binutils as accepts single '/' as if it were a comment

2011-01-11 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12390 Rafael Ávila de Espíndola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rafael.espindola at gmail

[Bug gold/12388] icf_test.sh and icf_safe_test.sh fail

2011-01-11 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12388 --- Comment #1 from Sriraman Tallam 2011-01-12 02:04:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Created attachment 5190 [details] > testcase > > on x86_64-suse-linux I see > > FAIL: icf_test.sh > PASS: icf_keep_unique_test.sh > FAIL: icf_safe_tes

[Bug gas/12390] New: binutils as accepts single '/' as if it were a comment

2011-01-11 Thread nlewycky at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12390 Summary: binutils as accepts single '/' as if it were a comment Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: gas Assi

Re: [bug-binutils] Inconsistencies in symbol mapping output from 'ld'

2011-01-11 Thread Alan Modra
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:06:07AM -0600, Brad Mouring wrote: > Granted, I did not directly call ld, but rather provided them to be > passed. If direct invocation is not reproducing the problem, it seems > this may be a problem with gcc or my use of gcc Yes, looks like collect2 is eating --{no-

[Bug gold/12388] icf_test.sh and icf_safe_test.sh fail

2011-01-11 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12388 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com,

[Bug gold/12388] New: icf_test.sh and icf_safe_test.sh fail

2011-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12388 Summary: icf_test.sh and icf_safe_test.sh fail Product: binutils Version: 2.21 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: i...@airs.com

Re: [bug-binutils] Inconsistencies in symbol mapping output from 'ld'

2011-01-11 Thread Brad Mouring
Alan Modra wrote on 01/10/2011 07:02:51 PM: > From: Alan Modra > To: Brad Mouring > Cc: bug-binutils@gnu.org > Date: 01/10/2011 07:03 PM > Subject: Re: [bug-binutils] Inconsistencies in symbol mapping outputfrom 'ld' > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:26:42AM -0600, Brad Mouring wrote: > > Using

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-11 Thread sedat.dilek at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #7 from Sedat Dilek 2011-01-11 12:15:39 UTC --- When dropping PR ld/12001 patch, what's with the testcase as reference to it [1]? - Sedat - [1] "Add a testcase for PR ld/12001." http://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils.git;a=commit;

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-11 Thread sedat.dilek at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #6 from Sedat Dilek 2011-01-11 12:10:18 UTC --- Wouldn't it be easier to just apply H.J. new patch on top of binutils trunk? I a 2nd thought I am thinking of cherry-picking PR ld/12237 (which is in binutils/experimental, see [1]),

[Bug gold/12386] gold doesn't support --unresolved-symbols=ignore-in-shared-libs

2011-01-11 Thread sv at sw dot ru
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12386 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Simonov 2011-01-11 09:42:35 UTC --- It looks like gold may accept --unresolved-symbols=ignore-in-shared-libs and just ignore it:) Cause it is gold's default. According http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i

[Bug gold/12386] New: gold doesn't support --unresolved-symbols=ignore-in-shared-libs

2011-01-11 Thread sv at sw dot ru
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12386 Summary: gold doesn't support --unresolved-symbols=ignore-in-shared-libs Product: binutils Version: 2.21 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Comp