http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12295
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Peter Lawrence writes:
> the question I have today is what is the point of all these
> definitions being passed in as arguments to "make", shouldn't
> this have been fixed by "configure", the Makefile is generated by
> "configure", so all these definitions should have
> been finalized at that poi
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12295
Summary: multiple definition and undefined reference errors
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assigned
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12293
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
All,
here is some totally unreadable output from building
binutils. I would like to do some cleaning up
of the situation, but first I will have to understand what is going
on and why.
the question I have today is what is the point of all these
definitions being passed in as arg
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12293
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-07 18:20:27
UTC ---
I see
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12293
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-07 18:16:24
UTC ---
I got
[...@gnu-6 pr12245-10]$ make
/usr/gcc-4.6/bin/gcc -O -flto -c -o main.o main.c
/usr/gcc-4.6/bin/gcc -O -flto -c -o foo.o foo.c
/usr/gcc-4.6/bin/gcc -O -c -o bar.o bar.c
ar cr pr
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12293
Summary: LTO does not work if all IR objects are sitting in
static archives
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
