http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
--- Comment #11 from Finn Thain 2010-11-04
04:40:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Which leaves my wondering how Thorsten was able to build libgfortran for
> CPU32...
Did you build without optimization? That would explain why it builds
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
--- Comment #10 from Finn Thain 2010-11-04
01:51:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Perhaps the issue with libgfortran on CPU32 is also academic. But academic or
> not, binutils needs to be fixed for CPU32 because gas behaviour doesn't agre
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10708
--- Comment #10 from Cary Coutant 2010-11-04
00:08:46 UTC ---
I found another leak that will explain the problem -- if you're using the
--no-keep-files-mapped option (or a 32-bit build of gold, for which that's the
default) and --gc-sections a
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
--- Comment #9 from Finn Thain 2010-11-04
01:01:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> fido doesn't have an MMU to my knowledge, nor an FPU. Trying to build Linux
> for it is a bit silly.
I don't know of a Linux port for fido either. The fido
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
--- Comment #8 from Thorsten Glaser 2010-11-03 21:40:43
UTC ---
Interesting, as fidoa is FL_MMU in gcc.
Thanks for the discussion though. I don’t know if there is something to be
done in binutils, but I will build multi{arch,lib} in Debian/m6
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
Daniel Jacobowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drow at sources dot
On 18 Sep 08:02, NEGISHI, Kiyoshi usa.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I believe that encoding old INTEL AVX FMA and AMD FMA4 is different
> specifications.
>
> in gas format:
> vfmaddpd %xmm4,%xmm6,%xmm2,%xmm7
>
> operand order is
> vfmaddpd src3, src2, src1, dest
>
> that's right?
>
> gas encodin
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12001
--- Comment #8 from Mark Mitchell 2010-11-03
17:47:36 UTC ---
Nick --
Thanks for fixing this!
-- Mark
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12001
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12186
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12186
hezekiahehud at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hezekiahehud at gmail do
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12186
Summary: "add ebx, OFFSET FLAT:_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_" is
incorrectly assembled
Product: binutils
Version: 2.21 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184
--- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora 2010-11-03 12:33:40
UTC ---
Created attachment 5107
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5107
testcase with precompiled binaries.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userpre
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184
--- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora 2010-11-03 11:57:38
UTC ---
hmm, in fact the .o and .exe are broken, so there's a bug in assembler.
diff -uNr 32.good/test.exe.asm 32.bad/test.exe.asm
--- 32.good/test.exe.asm2010-11-03 11:20:41.304319
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12185
yufanyufan at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
--
Configure bugmail:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12185
Summary: byte' might be used uninitialized in gold
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassi
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184
Summary: explicite --enable-targets ./configure option breaks
mingw binaries.
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
--- Comment #6 from Finn Thain 2010-11-03
09:30:13 UTC ---
> You are using the wrong target. m68k-linux is only compatible with m68k-linux.
(Neglecting FPU emulation for fido-elf: someone else can worry about this bug
as I don't have time or
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab 2010-11-03 08:40:08
UTC ---
You are using the wrong target. m68k-linux is only compatible with m68k-linux.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiv
19 matches
Mail list logo