[Bug binutils/11017] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-11-24 Thread schwab at linux-m68k dot org
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-11-24 21:42 --- *** Bug 11014 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bu

[Bug binutils/11014] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-11-24 Thread schwab at linux-m68k dot org
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-11-24 21:42 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11017 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11017] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-11-24 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2009-11-24 21:41 --- *** Bug 11016 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, o

[Bug binutils/11016] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-11-24 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2009-11-24 21:41 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11017 *** -- What|Removed |Added Stat

[Bug binutils/11017] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-11-24 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2009-11-24 21:39 --- Random comment coming out of the woodwork: I can't help thinking that you should change this and all uses to TARGET_PAGE_SIZE and TARGET_PAGE_MASK, and the problem would probably be solved. If you *really* need th

[Bug binutils/11017] New: PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-11-24 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
dlltool.c(244) defines PAGE_SIZE The PAGE_SIZE symbol is/should be defined in limits.h on a POSIX system (see http://www.opengroup.org). NT POSIX subsystem (SUA) defines it to 0x1 (10*0x1000). In my headers PAGE_SIZE is defined as an enum and dlltool.c generates a compiler error due to PAGE_SI

[Bug binutils/11016] New: PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-11-24 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
dlltool.c(244) defines PAGE_SIZE The PAGE_SIZE symbol is/should be defined in limits.h on a POSIX system (see http://www.opengroup.org). NT POSIX subsystem (SUA) defines it to 0x1 (10*0x1000). In my headers PAGE_SIZE is defined as an enum and dlltool.c generates a compiler error due to PAGE_SI

[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol

2009-11-24 Thread rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk 2009-11-24 19:34 --- The problem is that the .debug_info section in thr-objc_gc.o references thread_cancel. How did you compile that file? -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug binutils/11014] New: PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-11-24 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
dlltool.c(244) defines PAGE_SIZE The PAGE_SIZE symbol is/should be defined in limits.h on a POSIX system (see http://www.opengroup.org). NT POSIX subsystem (SUA) defines it to 0x1 (10*0x1000). In my headers PAGE_SIZE is defined as an enum and dlltool.c generates a compiler error due to PAGE_SI

[Bug ld/10956] Missing --no-relax option

2009-11-24 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-24 16:17 --- - bfd_boolean relax; + signed int disable_target_specific_optimizations; Why rename it to "target_specific_optimizations"? It's still relaxation. I do like the macros though. You could stand to use them i

Re: Error while compiling Binutils-2.20

2009-11-24 Thread Bill Zhao
Nick Clifton wrote: > > Hi Marco, > >> libtool: link: ar rc .libs/libbfd.a archive.o archures.o bfd.o bfdio.o >> bfdwin.o cache.o coffgen.o corefile.o format.o init.o libbfd.o opncls.o >> reloc.o section.o syms.o targets.o hash.o linker.o srec.o binary.o >> tekhex.o ihex.o stabs.o stab-syms.o

[Bug ld/10956] Missing --no-relax option

2009-11-24 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-24 15:16 --- Hi Richard, How about this patch ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug ld/10956] Missing --no-relax option

2009-11-24 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-24 15:15 --- Created an attachment (id=4414) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4414&action=view) Implement --no-relax as a generic linker command line option -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug gas/11013] New: Incorrect Thumb2 encoding for saturating addition and subtraction

2009-11-24 Thread anthony dot fox at cl dot cam dot ac dot uk
The following code produces incorrect op-codes: @ start .syntax unified .thumb qaddr1,r2,r3 qdadd r1,r2,r3 qsubr1,r2,r3 qdsub r1,r2,r3 @ finish gas gives FA82F183 FA82F193 FA82F1A3 FA82F1B3 whereas it should give FA83F182 FA83F192 FA83F1A2 FA83F1B2 -- Summary: Incorrect

[Bug ld/11012] New: -Wl, -z, nocombreloc doesn't work with IRELATIVE relocations

2009-11-24 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
All prelink ifunc* tests fail on powerpc64 when doing make check-cycle (in the pass with -Wl,-z,nocombreloc). The failures are in all ld.so modes, ldd -d -r ./ifunc1lib1.so, LD_TRACE_PRELINKING=1 ./ld64.so.1 ./ifunc1lib1.so or when just doing ./ld64.so.1 ./ifunc1lib1.so, even without prelinking be

[Bug gas/11011] New: gas/config/tc-arm.c:2489: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement

2009-11-24 Thread jksgfv at tut dot by
OS: Windows XP (cygwin) GCC: 4.4.2 configure args: ../../src/binutils-2.20/configure --target=arm-elf --prefix=/opt/arm --enable-interwork --enable-multilib these configure args are recommended at http://www.gnuarm.com/support.html#build Buld log (after the second "make", the first was "make -j3