[Bug gas/10636] x86-64 assembler misassemble 32bit absolute address

2009-09-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-14 22:06 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug gas/10637] x86 assembler failed to handle [addr] in Intel mode

2009-09-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-14 22:02 --- Subject: Bug 10637 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: h...@sourceware.org 2009-09-14 22:02:27 Modified files: gas: ChangeLog gas/config : t

[Bug gas/10637] x86 assembler failed to handle [addr] in Intel mode

2009-09-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-14 21:49 --- This is a regression. The older assembler does: [...@gnu-33 memory-6]$ cat y.s .text .intel_syntax noprefix mov ebx, [0xEE000F0] mov dword ptr [0xEE000F0], ebx [...@gnu-33

[Bug gas/10637] x86 assembler failed to handle [addr] in Intel mode

2009-09-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-14 21:39 --- A patch is posted at https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#all/123ba7dce13b902f -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on th

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-14 Thread george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com
--- Additional Comments From george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com 2009-09-14 20:11 --- Subject: RE: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores Thanks for the patch. I'll give it a try. The internet-Nazis on my end blocked simple.o for some reason (even though they didn't seem to

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 16:26 --- Hi Bill, > Not sure why you need simple.o since it is "simple" to compile, Because without it I have to create a compiler and then compile simple.cc. Plus I have to hope that I am using the same set of compiler

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 16:22 --- Created an attachment (id=4197) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4197&action=view) Work around assertion failure -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10629 --- You are r

[Bug gas/10636] x86-64 assembler misassemble 32bit absolute address

2009-09-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-14 13:58 --- Subject: Bug 10636 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: h...@sourceware.org 2009-09-14 13:57:45 Modified files: gas: ChangeLog gas/config : t

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-14 Thread george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com
--- Additional Comments From george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com 2009-09-14 13:33 --- Subject: RE: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores Not sure why you need simple.o since it is "simple" to compile, but it and xerces 28 are attached. If you don't get xerces, the binary is

[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

2009-09-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 12:37 --- Hi George, Would it be possible for you to upload the sample.o and libxerces-c.so.28.0 files so that we can try to reproduce this bug ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ld/10406] ld terminated with signal 11 [segmentation fault]

2009-09-14 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-09-14 07:12 --- Yes, the error may well only occur when ld is linking non-gcc object files. Regardless, ld should not segfault. Can you build binutils with debug info and provide a backtrace? -- http://sourceware.or