[Bug gold/10238] Gold linker does not resolve symbols using indirect dependencies

2009-07-27 Thread apratt at us dot ibm dot com
--- Additional Comments From apratt at us dot ibm dot com 2009-07-27 18:24 --- Reviewing this bug (due to this weekend's new comment), I notice I never answered the question about why PurifyPlus is using this indirect-link feature. I spoke with the developer who did the original Linux p

[Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly

2009-07-27 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-07-27 17:26 --- (In reply to comment #15) > Hi H.J. > > > I am afraid it is wrong. You have to duplicate the whole > > logic in elf_link_output_extsym: > > Of course. My bad. So do you agree that the revised version of

[Bug binutils/10413] Does -j sectname do anything useful?

2009-07-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-27 17:08 --- Subject: Bug 10413 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-07-27 17:08:03 Modified files: binutils : ChangeLog objdump.c Log message:

[Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly

2009-07-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-27 17:14 --- Hi H.J. > I am afraid it is wrong. You have to duplicate the whole > logic in elf_link_output_extsym: Of course. My bad. So do you agree that the revised version of this patch will work for the x86 and x86_64 b

[Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly

2009-07-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-27 17:13 --- Created an attachment (id=4090) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4090&action=view) Revised version of the patch -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug binutils/10413] Does -j sectname do anything useful?

2009-07-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-27 17:07 --- Hi Marty, Thanks for reporting this problem, and for providing a patch. As it turns out there is already a function like test_good() in the objdump sources, so I am going to apply the uploaded patch instead. C

[Bug binutils/10413] Does -j sectname do anything useful?

2009-07-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-27 17:06 --- Created an attachment (id=4089) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4089&action=view) When displaying section headers, skip any sections that we are ignoring. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzil

[Bug gas/10430] tc-mips.c generates "format not a string literal and no format arguments" errors (diff submitted)

2009-07-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-27 16:54 --- Hi Carter, Thanks for reporting this problem. As it happens this bug was fixed as part of the patch for PR 10437, which was the same problem excepted reported against the PDP-11 toolchain. Since I have already

[Bug gas/10443] Silently ignoring shifter arguments within mov (thumb mode) leading to wrong assembly.

2009-07-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-27 16:06 --- Hi Wolfgang, Please try out the uploaded patch and let me know what you think. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gas/10443] Silently ignoring shifter arguments within mov (thumb mode) leading to wrong assembly.

2009-07-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-27 16:05 --- Created an attachment (id=4088) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4088&action=view) Generate an error message if an unsupported shifted operand is encountered in a THUMB MOV or CMP instruction