--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-06-18
23:20 ---
Testcase fixed.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10255
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at vnet dot ibm dot
||com
http://sourceware.org/bugzill
--- Additional Comments From bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-06-18
19:47 ---
The new test case is failing for me on ppc64 like:
/home/bergner/binutils/build/binutils-pr10255/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/readelf
-wf dump.o
Executing on host: sh -c
{/home/bergner/binutils/build/binu
Here is a Python script that creates a raw binary and runs objdump on it to
reproduce the problem with the output following...
#
import commands
raw_binary = open("raw_binary", "w")
raw_binary.write(chr(0x1f) + chr(0x19) + ch
--- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-06-18 18:33
---
I think your patch may have done more than you think. It not only removed
coprocessor instructions that are not supported by ARM7TDMI, but also removed
coprocessor instructions that *are* supported by ARM7TDMI.
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18
16:36 ---
Subject: Bug 10169
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-06-18 16:36:05
Modified files:
gas/config : tc-arm.c
gas: Ch
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-06-18 16:35
---
Hi Anthony,
Thank you for reporting this bug. I am going to apply the uploaded patch to
fix the assembler and also a test case for the erroneous instructions.
Cheers
Nick
gas/ChangeLog
2009-06-18 Nick Clif
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-06-18 16:33
---
Created an attachment (id=4007)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4007&action=view)
Catch out of range shift values for SSAT and USAT instructions.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-06-18
13:57 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-06-18 10:38
---
Hi Chris,
Right, first of all, I have checked in the patch along with the changelog
entries below.
Secondly you asked: "What was your rationale for remove *all* coprocessor
instructions?" The answer is that
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18
10:31 ---
Subject: Bug 10288
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-06-18 10:31:21
Modified files:
include: ChangeLog dis-asm.h
gas/test
11 matches
Mail list logo
