[Bug gas/10271] build fails for sh2a

2009-06-12 Thread ce at embedded-software dot de
--- Additional Comments From ce at embedded-software dot de 2009-06-13 01:32 --- Not really, but it is a problem of the SH2A configuration not really supported on GCC 4.4.0 as I found out (sadly). (In reply to comment #3) > It looks a duplicate of PR6750. > -- What|R

[Bug gas/10271] build fails for sh2a

2009-06-12 Thread kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp
--- Additional Comments From kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp 2009-06-12 21:58 --- It looks a duplicate of PR6750. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10271 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching s

[Bug ld/10270] IFUNC local symbol

2009-06-12 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
-- What|Removed |Added CC||drepper at redhat dot com, ||roland at redhat dot com http://so

[Bug ld/10270] IFUNC local symbol

2009-06-12 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2009-06-12 19:10 --- The problem with using normal symbol is that if some shared library calls such a symbol, the .got.plt slot in the shared library will contain address of the .plt slot in the binary and only its .got.plt will contai

[Bug gas/10271] build fails for sh2a

2009-06-12 Thread ce at embedded-software dot de
--- Additional Comments From ce at embedded-software dot de 2009-06-12 17:25 --- I assigned this bug to GCC as well bug # 40428 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10271 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are wat

[Bug gas/10271] build fails for sh2a

2009-06-12 Thread ce at embedded-software dot de
--- Additional Comments From ce at embedded-software dot de 2009-06-12 17:25 --- Created an attachment (id=3991) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3991&action=view) This is the complete log of the build. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10271 -

[Bug gas/10271] New: build fails for sh2a

2009-06-12 Thread ce at embedded-software dot de
When I try to build GCC 4.4.0 with binutils 2.19.1 for sh2a (Hitachi SuperH) I get the following: "Internal error, aborting at /var/tmp/cross/sh2a-linux-uclibc/por tage/cross-sh2a-linux-uclibc/binutils-2.19.1-r1/work/binutils-2.19.1/gas/config/ tc-sh.c line 3968 in md_apply_fix Please report this b

[Bug ld/10270] IFUNC local symbol

2009-06-12 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hjl dot tools at gmail dot |redhat dot com |com Status|NEW

[Bug gas/10269] IFUNC gas problem

2009-06-12 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hjl dot tools at gmail dot |redhat dot com |com Status|NEW

[Bug ld/10270] New: IFUNC local symbol

2009-06-12 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
See ifunc3 testcase in http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2009-06/msg00199.html If binary overrides some shared library's symbol with its STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and the binary takes address of that symbol, the symbol defined in the binary shouldn't be IMHO STT_GNU_IFUNC pointing to the indirect fu

[Bug gas/10269] New: IFUNC gas problem

2009-06-12 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
#ifndef PICKNO # define PICKNO 1 #endif #if PICKNO == 2 # define PICK(fn1, fn2) #fn2 #else # define PICK(fn1, fn2) #fn1 #endif #ifdef __x86_64__ # define IFUNC_ASM(fn) "\tleaq " fn "(%rip), %rax\n\tretq\n" #endif #define IFUNC(name, globl, fn1, fn2) \ extern __typeof (fn1) fn1 __attribute__((used))

[Bug binutils/10263] objdump does not disassemble ARM code entered with .word directives

2009-06-12 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Additional Comments From mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-06-12 15:31 --- Nick, (In reply to comment #1) > > mov r0, r1 > > .word 0xe1a1 > > bx lr > > >0: e1a1mov r0, r1 > >4: e1a1.word 0xe1a1 > >

[Bug binutils/10263] objdump does not disassemble ARM code entered with .word directives

2009-06-12 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-06-12 12:22 --- Subject: Re: New: objdump does not disassemble ARM code entered with .word directives Hi Mike, > It used to be possible to enter instructions with .word directives and then > disassemble them with objdump -d, b

Re: [Bug binutils/10263] New: objdump does not disassemble ARM code entered with .word directives

2009-06-12 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Mike, It used to be possible to enter instructions with .word directives and then disassemble them with objdump -d, but that no longer works. Example: mov r0, r1 .word 0xe1a1 bx lr 0: e1a1mov r0, r1 4: e1a1.wor