STT_GNU_IFUNC definition doesn't work in executable. I have a glibc patch:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2009-05/msg00182.html
But it doesn't work with static executables. Should we allow
STT_GNU_IFUNC definition in executable at all?
[...@gnu-34 ifunc-2]$ cat prog.c
extern int foo (int);
Hi Harry,
I want to know what to do if I want to let binutils support another
architecture, for example, if we have one new processor with some
different instructions, how to add them to binutils?
There are two basic methods. If your new processor is just a variant of
a currently existin
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-05-26 15:37
---
Hi Liran,
Thanks for reporting this problem. The change you suggest is slightly wrong
in that it fixes the generated file bfin-parse.c which is built from the source
file gas/config/bfin-parse.y, but apart from
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-26
15:35 ---
Subject: Bug 10143
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-05-26 15:35:37
Modified files:
gas: ChangeLog
gas/config : b
--- Additional Comments From chenyang dot cq at gmail dot com 2009-05-26
14:03 ---
Thank u Alan for the directions.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10193
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someo
I have an environment for cross compilation and cross Linking for Windows under
Linux, the environment was built using
http://www.profv.de/mingw_cross_env/README.html ->
http://www.profv.de/mingw_cross_env/mingw_cross_env-2.5.tar.gz
.
It works good enough for me producing working Windows console