--- Additional Comments From sgh at sgh dot dk 2009-04-09 17:31 ---
excellent, thanks :D
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7093
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-09
16:43 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/src-cvs/2009-q2/msg3.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09
16:07 ---
Subject: Bug 9824
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-04-09 16:06:48
Modified files:
ld : ChangeLog ld.texinfo
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 16:05
---
Hi Rich,
I am going to check in the uploaded patch to document these keywords.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 16:04
---
Created an attachment (id=3869)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3869&action=view)
Document the ONLY_IF_RO, ONLY_IF_RW and CONSTANT linker script directives.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugz
--- Additional Comments From bastian dot schick at sciopta dot com
2009-04-09 15:20 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Hi Nick
> This is not a bug. The assembler is quite reasonably translating the
> requested operation (move low register to low register whilst setting the
> status
> bit
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 15:00
---
Hi Bastian,
This is not a bug. The assembler is quite reasonably translating the
requested operation (move low register to low register whilst setting the status
bits) into a machine instruction that will perfo
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 14:45
---
Hi Soren,
The patch is applied to the mainline code and will be present in the next
release.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 14:32
---
Hi Claudius,
You are using a slightly out of date version of binutils (2.18 as opposed to
2.19), but the bug is present in the current sources anyway.
Please could you try out the uploaded patch which I think
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 14:30
---
Created an attachment (id=3868)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3868&action=view)
Allow external symbols for the section comdat symbol
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
Hi Phil,
When the same address is pointed to by many symbols, it seems gprof does
everything to make the right choice for the symbol name to use ... except
filling the Sym structure correctly. Here is a patch.
Thanks - I have applied your patch along with this changelog entry.
Cheers
Nick
11 matches
Mail list logo
