--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
22:14 ---
Here is the patch:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-01/msg00315.html
This patch supports relative prefix:
bash-3.2$ ./objdump -S --prefix=src --prefix-strip=6 libx.so
libx.so: file format elf64
--- Additional Comments From arjan at infradead dot org 2009-01-25 21:25
---
as an example of what this allowed me to do:
http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=196674
that page first shows the "raw" kernel oops
the second section is the "uses objdump -S" part, which is now possible w
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
21:07 ---
FRV doesn't support 64bit host
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|hjl dot tools at gm
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2009-01-25 20:51 ---
As far as I know it is not a regression.
I recently switched my host from 32bit to 64bit, and after rebuilding my cross
toolchains I ran into this issue.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9785
--
--- Additional Comments From arjan at infradead dot org 2009-01-25 20:50
---
works great for me!
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9784
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
20:45 ---
Is this a regression? What is the last working binutils?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9785
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, o
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
20:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=3686)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3686&action=view)
A patch
Please try this patch.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9784
--- Yo
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2009-01-25 20:23 ---
$ cat test.S
setlos #0xe000,gr3
$ /path/to/32bit-binutils/bin/frv-linux-as test.S
$ /path/to/64bit-binutils/bin/frv-linux-as test.S
test.S: Assembler messages:
test.S:1: Error: operand out of
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
20:13 ---
Please provide a small testcase.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
20:07 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Subject: Re: Additional switches to disallow processor supplementary
> instructions
>
>
> --- On Sun, 25/1/09, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
wrote:
>
> > I can add switches
--- Additional Comments From markhobley at yahoo dot co dot uk 2009-01-25
19:43 ---
Subject: Re: Additional switches to disallow processor supplementary
instructions
--- On Sun, 25/1/09, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
wrote:
> I can add switches based on CPUID features. I can't ad
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot
||com
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From arjan at infradead dot org 2009-01-25 17:27
---
On first order, the strip thing is nice but not required;
I mean, I can get stuff laid out in the tree I construct in the prefix location.
But yeah it'd be a nice addition.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzill
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
17:19 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Specifically, most of the files I deal with have a source in a tree at
> /usr/src/debug/kernel-2.6.27/*
>
> Now, what I would like to do is make a prefix so that if a package sets
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-25
17:09 ---
I can add switches based on CPUID features. I can't add switches
for instructions without feature bits from CPUID.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9782
--- You are receiving this m
15 matches
Mail list logo
