[Bug binutils/9695] BFD internal error while using oprofile on Gentoo with binutils 2.19

2009-01-18 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-01-19 06:12 --- . -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/9695] BFD internal error while using oprofile on Gentoo with binutils 2.19

2009-01-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-19 06:11 --- Subject: Bug 9695 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: amo...@sourceware.org 2009-01-19 06:11:23 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog pdp11.c Log message:

[Bug ld/6027] Bootstrap of combined gcc + binutils, with --enable-shared, with sysroot fails

2009-01-18 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-01-19 00:07 --- ..added a comment to the gcc buzilla is what I meant to say. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6027 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the

[Bug ld/6027] Bootstrap of combined gcc + binutils, with --enable-shared, with sysroot fails

2009-01-18 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-01-18 23:37 --- Yes, I did look at the gcc bugzillas, and I don't believe that ld is doing anything wrong with sysrooted paths. I've added a comment to the glibc bugzilla. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug ld/6027] Bootstrap of combined gcc + binutils, with --enable-shared, with sysroot fails

2009-01-18 Thread oblivian at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Additional Comments From oblivian at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-01-18 17:49 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Sorry, you haven't presented any evidence of a sysroot ld bug. All you've > really shown is that bootstrapping toolchains is difficult. The patch in > http://sourcewar