[Bug ld/6027] Bootstrap of combined gcc + binutils, with --enable-shared, with sysroot fails

2009-01-16 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-01-17 02:37 --- Sorry, you haven't presented any evidence of a sysroot ld bug. All you've really shown is that bootstrapping toolchains is difficult. The patch in http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4966 is d

[Bug binutils/9749] The section is put not in order

2009-01-16 Thread uzytkownik2 at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From uzytkownik2 at gmail dot com 2009-01-16 21:32 --- The test case: http://github.com/uzytkownik/nios/tree/master -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9749 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug,

Re: gold and shared objects with gcc 4.1.2

2009-01-16 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Roland Baumann writes: > this patch indeed fixes my problem. Thanks a lot. You're welcome. Thanks for reporting the bug. > Actually, I am wondering whether it makes sense to use "-s" and > "-shared" together. What information stays in the shared object that I > am still able to link it? An EL

Re: gold and shared objects with gcc 4.1.2

2009-01-16 Thread Roland Baumann
Hi Ian, this patch indeed fixes my problem. Thanks a lot. Actually, I am wondering whether it makes sense to use "-s" and "-shared" together. What information stays in the shared object that I am still able to link it? Roland Ian Lance Taylor wrote: Roland Baumann writes: I compile this