--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2008-08-15
05:35 ---
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2008-08/msg00069.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2008-08/msg00073.html
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2008-08-15
05:32 ---
Were you building from a release tarball, a snapshot, or cvs? If from a proper
release you should have deffilep.c and deffilep.h so yacc is not needed.
Otherwise, yes, you do need yacc available.
--
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2008-08-15
05:24 ---
Please try current mainline. A 2008-08-01 change may have fixed this. If it
still fails, please attach one of your failing PE exes to this bug report.
--
What|Removed
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2008-08-15
00:41 ---
Does your project link if you omit --gc-sections from the ld options?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-14
22:58 ---
You can't pop/push 32bit registers in 64bit mode.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-14
22:39 ---
The GDB Console Listing attachment shows the parameters on the command call.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the C
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-14
22:37 ---
I have not been really able to cut the execution down to a reasonale test
size. I wish I could.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-14
22:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=2907)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2907&action=view)
The file created with the -M flag
Just in case you may have wanted it.
--
http://sourceware.org/
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-14
22:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=2906)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2906&action=view)
Full execution console listing while under GDB.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-14
22:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=2905)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2905&action=view)
This is trace information from GDB.
Let me know if you want more information and how to get it for y
We are upgrading our cross-compiler from GCC 2.95.2, binutils 2.10.1 to GCC
4.2.0, binutils 2.17. Cross compiling from Linux i686 to PowerPC. What we
create is a statically built firmware from 1000+ modules. This "firmware" gets
downloaded into flash on the devices we build.
We get a segmenta
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2008-08-14
13:56 ---
Patch applied.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESO
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-08-14 10:42
---
Subject: Re: Crash while handling DW_AT_abstract_origin
fora last comp unit
Hi Dmitry,
>> If you run your ELF binary through "readelf -w" does it report any
>> problems with the debug information ?
>
> Yes
Hi Dmitry,
If you run your ELF binary through "readelf -w" does it report any
problems with the debug information ?
Yes, a lot of. Like this:
readelf: Warning: There is a hole [0xab1ea0 - 0xab2551] in .debug_loc section.
readelf: Warning: There is an overlap [0xab25ab - 0xab1ea0] in .debug_loc
--- Additional Comments From divis1969 at gmail dot com 2008-08-14 10:10
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> If you run your ELF binary through "readelf -w" does it report any
> problems with the debug information ?
Yes, a lot of. Like this:
readelf: Warning: There is a hole [0xab1ea0 - 0x
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-08-14 09:20
---
Hi Dmitry,
> My application is using BFD library for handling ELF file generated
> by ADS 1.2. Unfortunately, I cannot share this ELF file since it
> contains some proprietary info.
If you run your ELF binary th
--- Additional Comments From sebastian dot huber at embedded-brains dot de
2008-08-14 07:37 ---
This should fix it:
diff -u opcodes/ppc-opc.c*
--- opcodes/ppc-opc.c 2008-08-14 09:32:22.0 +0200
+++ opcodes/ppc-opc.c.new 2008-08-14 09:32:18.0 +0200
@@ -3081,7 +3081
18 matches
Mail list logo
