[Bug ld/6430] --sort-common Not Implemented Per Documentation

2008-04-21 Thread evandro at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-04-22 01:05 --- You are correct in that this way a gap would be avoided when the size changes. But given that all like-sized symbols are laid out back to back, this only happens when the size changes. So, either the manual must

[Bug ld/6431] ld says: invalid version 3 (max 0)

2008-04-21 Thread niki dot waibel at gmx dot net
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug ld/6430] --sort-common Not Implemented Per Documentation

2008-04-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-04-21 21:20 --- Linker manual says `--sort-common' This option tells `ld' to sort the common symbols by size when it places them in the appropriate output sections. First come all the one byte symbols, then

[Bug binutils/6412] New binutils is incompatible with old object files

2008-04-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-04-21 21:15 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-04/msg00348.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6412 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the C