--- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2008-03-05 01:45
---
Subject: Re: pushsection/popsection doesn't work on Itanium
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> asm (".section .parasections, \"ax\", @progbits");
I would suggest something like
asm (".section .par
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-05
01:07 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Unfortunately, x86 doesn't have a GP register proper. MIPS and PPC and
> possibly
> IPF do though.
>
What is the expect result on MIPS/PPC/IPF?
--
http://sourceware.org/bug
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-03-05 00:11
---
"-G size" sets the global g_switch_value in LD. This value is used to with
bfd_set_gp_size in ldlang_add_file for regular modules. However,
ldlang_add_file is never called for archived modules.
Unfortunately, x
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-05
00:02 ---
It works for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ gcc -c x.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ readelf -S x.o
There are 14 section headers, starting at offset 0x2f0:
Section Headers:
[Nr] Name Type
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot
||com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-04
23:51 ---
How can I reproduce it on Linux/x86-64? What target should I use?
Linker manual says:
`-GVALUE'
`--gpsize=VALUE'
Set the maximum size of objects to be optimized using the GP
register to SIZE. Thi
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC host triplet||Itanium
GCC target triplet||Itanium
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
On RHEL5.1, compile the following gcc code. The compiled ELF code doesn't
contain parasection which is defined by pushsection/popsection in the gcc code.
The compiled .o file still contains parasection. But the linked ELF loses the
section. If changing linker to ld V2.18, the issue is still exis
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot
||com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-03-04 17:29
---
Instructions to reproduce this issue:
as d.s -o d.o
as e.s -o e.o
ar r e.a e.o
The command below results in both "e4" and "ef" to be placed in .bss:
ld d.o e.a
Whereas the command below correctly places "e4" i
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-03-04 17:27
---
Created an attachment (id=2304)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2304&action=view)
Archived module
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5866
--- You are receiving this
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-03-04 17:26
---
Created an attachment (id=2303)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2303&action=view)
Regular module
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5866
--- You are receiving this m
It seems that calling bfd_get_gp_size always returns 0 for a module found in an
archive, no matter the value passed to LD via the -G option.
The result is that when deciding whether to place public common symbols in the
small BSS section or in the regular one, if such symbols reside in an archived
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2008-03-04
09:53 ---
Please attach a test case. Your bug report doesn't make sense. You say you are
using #define, ie. C preprocessor macros, but complain about a gas macro error
message.
--
What|Removed
14 matches
Mail list logo
