--- Additional Comments From SebastianR at gmx dot de 2008-01-07 22:32
---
Thanks a lot!
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5522
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-01-07 17:54
---
Hi Jakub,
I agree with your first suggested patch, so I am going to apply the uploaded
version of it.
I am not sure about the second change (to bfd_close). I agree that it looks
good, but I have a nagging su
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-01-07 17:53
---
Created an attachment (id=2179)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2179&action=view)
Test for the presence of a vms private data structure
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
Hi Yevgeniy,
libtool: link: gcc -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g
-O2 -o .libs/ld-new ldgram.o ldlex.o lexsup.o ldlang.o mri.o ldctor.o ldmain.o
ldwrite.o ldexp.o ldemul.o ldver.o ldmisc.o ldfile.o ldcref.o sha1.o
eelf_i386_ldso.o eelf_i386.o eelf_x86_64.o /usr/local
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-01-07 16:54
---
Hi Dave,
Please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it works for
you ? (Obvioulsy you will need to regenerate opcodes/configure as well).
There appears to be several different configure v
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-01-07 16:52
---
Created an attachment (id=2178)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2178&action=view)
Use the correct file extension for HPUX shared libraries
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2008-01-07 16:51 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00152.html
--
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-01-07 16:45
---
Hi Joerg,
Please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it resolves the
problem for you ?
Also - would it be possible for you to supply a small assembler source file
that demonstrates this pr
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-01-07 16:44
---
Created an attachment (id=2177)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2177&action=view)
Remove the warning
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5523
--- You are receiving thi
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-01-07 16:34
---
Hi Ambroz,
OK, that helps a bit. Now, please could you put together a *small* testcase
that reproduces the problem so that we can investigate why the patch to pe.em is
broken ?
Cheers
Nick
--
http://sou
--- Additional Comments From timb at bluearc dot com 2008-01-07 11:04
---
Created an attachment (id=2175)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2175&action=view)
Add --discard-section-groups option to ld
The obvious change to unique_section_p didn't quite seem to be eno
11 matches
Mail list logo
