--- Additional Comments From karvjorm at users dot sourceforge dot net
2007-10-09 05:11 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Well, it's 8-bit signed *and* 8-bit unsigned: perhaps saying
> "not in 8-bit signed or unsigned range" would sound better to you?
> If you have a better wording to sugg
--- Additional Comments From karvjorm at users dot sourceforge dot net
2007-10-09 05:09 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Well, it's 8-bit signed *and* 8-bit unsigned: perhaps saying
> "not in 8-bit signed or unsigned range" would sound better to you?
> If you have a better wording to sugg
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-10-09
04:27 ---
If an option isn't being passed to the linker, then that is a gcc driver bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-10-09
04:08 ---
Is this still the case with current binutils? A 2007-09-14 patch may have fixed
this problem.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-10-09
03:44 ---
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-05/msg00155.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From happyarch at gmail dot com 2007-10-08 15:54
---
when good comes to bad, bad come to good..
year 2003: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/binutils/2003-06/msg00653.html
year 2004: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-03/msg00160.html
year 2005: http://www.cygwin.
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:43
---
Hi Jorma,
OK, I understand now, but a fix is not necessary. This code is used only when
debugging the alpha port of the assembler. It is not enabled by default and no
normal user will ever see it. Thus it doe
--- Additional Comments From karvjorm at users dot sourceforge dot net
2007-10-08 15:36 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hi Jorma,
>
> I do not understand what you mean with this bug report. Please could you
> explain in some more detail ?
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
Sorry,
I did not exp
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:36
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix this problem.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:21
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix this problem.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:20
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix this problem.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:19
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix this problem.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:19
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix this problem.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:18
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix these problems.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:18
---
Hi Jorma,
This text occurs in debugging code which is not seen by normal users of the
assembler. It does not need to be internationalized.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |A
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:16
---
Hi Jorma,
I do not understand what you mean with this bug report. Please could you
explain in some more detail ?
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:15
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix this.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:15
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix this.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:14
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix this.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:14
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix this.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:13
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix this.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:12
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix this.
Cheers
--
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 10:20
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to change the text of the error message to "offset
out of range".
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 10:17
---
Hi Jorma,
The term "large" can have an absolute sense as opposed to a signed sense, but
I take your point. I have checked in a patch to change the message to read
"invalid immediate: %ld is out of range", which
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 10:11
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix the two "Unkown" spelling mistakes in the
tc-bfin.c file. The rest of this PR is a duplicate of 5121.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 10:07
---
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in the obvious fix for the error message.
I will leave clarification of the error messages up to the BlackFin
maintainers, if they feel that they need it.
Cheers
Nick
--
26 matches
Mail list logo