[Bug binutils/1219] binutils fail to recognize executables and shared libraries generated by Sun Studio 10 CC

--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31 05:06 --- Can you attach two example executables to this bug report (one that binutils recognises and one that does it does not)? Thanks. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1219 --- You are

[Bug binutils/1298] m68k-dis.c:1348: warning: argument 'info' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork'

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 --- You are receiving this mail because: --

[Bug binutils/1298] m68k-dis.c:1348: warning: argument 'info' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork'

-- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|ia64-linux-gnu | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You

[Bug ld/594] ld refuses to put data into PT_NOTE segment

-- What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet|i | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=594 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You

[Bug binutils/642] objcopy testsuite CC/CFLAGS make enviroment

--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31 03:43 --- The right way to specify tool specific variables is to put them in the RUNTESTFLAGS variable (relevant section of the runtest man page is shown below). ``Makefile style variables are used to specify

[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.

--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31 02:33 --- Fixed: 2006-03-31 Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR binutils/1860 * configure.in: Require makeinfo 4.4 or higher. * configure: Regenerate. Checking in configure.in; /cvs/src

[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.

-- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|hppa-linux | GCC target triplet|hppa64-linux| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 --

[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.

--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31 02:18 --- A patch is posted at: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-03/msg00364.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-31 02:06 --- Subject: Re: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory. > I think that raising the minimum requirement on Texinfo to version 4.4 is > quite > safe. I will submit a patch. Thanks. Dave --

[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.

--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31 02:05 --- I have examined the problem more extensively. The problem exists up to Texinfo version 4.3 (and point releases of 4.3). Texinfo 4.4 adds the necessary support for @include @value and is now the minimum