[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

2005-11-09 Thread michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net 2005-11-09 21:29 --- Sorry, the attachment lost its name: it's a gzipped tarball (ot.tar.gz). -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on th

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

2005-11-09 Thread michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net 2005-11-09 21:16 --- Created an attachment (id=753) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=753&action=view) testcase for optional symbols Okay, I gave it a try to build a testcase. It's included in the a

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

2005-11-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-09 16:25 --- Created an attachment (id=752) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=752&action=view) attempt to ignore OPTIONAL symbols -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 --- You are

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

2005-11-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-09 16:24 --- Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init' Hi Michael, > I don't have any information beyond the error message and what I learned from > the message to the mailing list quoted above. The behaviour of OP

Re: [Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

2005-11-09 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Michael, I don't have any information beyond the error message and what I learned from the message to the mailing list quoted above. The behaviour of OPTIONAL symbols seems to be that they're silently ignored if not present in any of the linked objects, allowing for using libraries if linked

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

2005-11-09 Thread michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net 2005-11-09 13:24 --- I don't have any information beyond the error message and what I learned from the message to the mailing list quoted above. The behaviour of OPTIONAL symbols seems to be that they're silently ignored