[Bug ld/1467] Orphaned section is put in the odd place

2005-10-11 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-12 05:53 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00142.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1467 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for

[Bug ld/1467] Orphaned section is put in the odd place

2005-10-11 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-12 01:02 --- Created an attachment (id=697) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=697&action=view) A testcase [EMAIL PROTECTED] orphan-1]$ make as -o foo.o foo.s ld -o foo -T ld.x foo.o readelf -Sl foo There are

[Bug ld/1467] New: Orphaned section is put in the odd place

2005-10-11 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
Orphaned section placement seems to be based on section name, which leads to odd placement of orphaned sections. -- Summary: Orphaned section is put in the odd place Product: binutils Version: 2.17 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: ld 2.16 bug in linker script ?

2005-10-11 Thread Philippe Biondi
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Alan Modra wrote: On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 05:28:15PM +0200, Philippe Biondi wrote: but I think these two linker scripts should be equivalent. No, you haven't specified where .got should go (*). ld is free to place unspecified sections where it likes. *) Which is quite f

[Bug binutils/1437] c++filt no longer works with stdin

2005-10-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-10-11 16:34 --- Subject: Re: c++filt no longer works with stdin Hi HJ, > It works for me. I have applied the patch. Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1437 --- You are receiving this

[Bug binutils/941] gas test macros fails

2005-10-11 Thread soete dot joel at tiscali dot be
-- What|Removed |Added CC||soete dot joel at tiscali ||dot be http://sourceware.org/bugzil

[Bug gas/848] gas testsuite FAIL: macros dot

2005-10-11 Thread soete dot joel at tiscali dot be
-- What|Removed |Added CC||soete dot joel at tiscali ||dot be http://sourceware.org/bugzil

[Bug binutils/1437] c++filt no longer works with stdin

2005-10-11 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-11 16:18 --- Subject: Re: New: c++filt no longer works with stdin On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:43:57PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi HJ, > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] testsuite]$ cat foo.s > >.type _Z1fv, @function > >[EMAIL

[Bug binutils/1391] objcopy trashes PE executable when using "add-gnu-debuglink"

2005-10-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-10-11 16:05 --- Subject: Re: objcopy trashes PE executable when using "add-gnu-debuglink" Hi, > currently one can fix this manually by executing additional step: > objcopy --change-section-vma .gnu_debuglink=+ test_xxx.exe >

Re: [Bug binutils/1391] objcopy trashes PE executable when using "add-gnu-debuglink"

2005-10-11 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi, currently one can fix this manually by executing additional step: objcopy --change-section-vma .gnu_debuglink=+ test_xxx.exe I did a grep on the sources but could not really find a location where the wrong VMA might be produced.. Could this be a bug in bfd library itself? Yes, although

Re: monitor instruction bug?

2005-10-11 Thread Alan Modra
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:57:45PM -0400, root wrote: > > monitor; 0F 01 C8 > > generates: > > 0f sidt (bad) > 01 c8add eax,ecx Not for me. I suspect you are using an old objdump. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre ___

[Bug binutils/1437] c++filt no longer works with stdin

2005-10-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-10-11 12:34 --- Subject: Re: New: c++filt no longer works with stdin Hi HJ, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] testsuite]$ cat foo.s > .type _Z1fv, @function > [EMAIL PROTECTED] testsuite]$ > /export/build/gnu/binutils-import/build-