[Bug binutils/1321] strip/objcopy don't handle SHF_LINK_ORDER correctly

2005-09-09 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-09-09 19:45 --- >From the gABI: SHF_LINK_ORDER This flag adds special ordering requirements for link editors. The requirements apply if the sh_link field of this section's header references another section (the linked-to section)

[Bug binutils/1321] strip/objcopy don't handle SHF_LINK_ORDER correctly

2005-09-09 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-09-09 19:47 --- Created an attachment (id=658) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=658&action=view) A testcase [EMAIL PROTECTED] strip-2]$ make as -x -o x.o x.s cp x.o y.o /usr/bin/strip -g y.o readelf -t --wide x.

[Bug binutils/1321] New: strip/objcopy doesn

2005-09-09 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
-- Summary: strip/objcopy doesn Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl at

[Bug binutils/1321] strip/objcopy don't handle SHF_LINK_ORDER correctly

2005-09-09 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-09-09 19:54 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-09/msg00118.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1321 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for

[Bug binutils/1312] LD outputting huge files.

2005-09-09 Thread drow at sources dot redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2005-09-09 15:43 --- Could you try removing the OUTPUT_FORMAT line, and using objcopy -O binary to convert the resulting ELF file to binary? Also, what does objdump -h say on the intermediate ELF file if you do that? --

Re: ld relocate symbols(in small common section) to a unaligned address.(on mips r3000 target)

2005-09-09 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Zhigang, Hmm. I am basically using the same or very similar sources as you. All the sources are from checkouts from the various CVS repositories on 8 Sept 2005. The versions are binutils v2.16.91, gcc v4.1.0, and newlib v1.13.0. I also configured my toolchain in the same way as you, a

Re: alpha linux: R_ALPHA_LITERAL relocation overflow

2005-09-09 Thread Mike Kasick
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:33:21AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > I suspect however that this might actually be a compiler problem, or > even a user problem. What I think might be happening is that the > compiler is creating code that assumes that __divqu function will be > within the 16-bit off

Re: ld relocate symbols(in small common section) to a unaligned address.(on mips r3000 target)

2005-09-09 Thread zhigang gong
Hi Nickļ¼Œ I am sorry for sent the big attachment to everyone in this mailist. I do will not do that thing from now on. Beacuse I can't access the cvs(behind a firewire) server. I just download the binutils-050909 , gcc-4.0-20050901 and newlib-1.13.0. And I rebuild binutils and gc

Re: ld relocate symbols(in small common section) to a unaligned address.(on mips r3000 target)

2005-09-09 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Zhigang, sorry i forgot to attach the file. Now attach the tar ball. Unfortunately you sent this huge attachment to the entire binutils mailing list, not just me. In the future please try not to do this. If you cannot create a small test case then please either just send the large test