-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am running binutils binutils-2.16.90.0.2-2mdk (Mandrake Cooker). After
upgrade from 2.15.x series which Mandrake used before, I am getting this
error on linking:
g++ --export-dynamic -o /home/janoc/src/VHD/VHDPP_TEST/bin/vhdMetaEngine
vhdMet
Hi - I'm trying to use gas 2.15 on PA-RISC, and I want to issue an ldcws
instruction like:
ldcws,co 0(%r20), %r19
which is accepted by the HP assembler, but gas barfs with:
Error: Invalid Short Load/Store Completer.
gas apparently doesn't like the cache control hint completor, which is
cr
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 18:01 ---
*** Bug 857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=936
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 19:59 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00293.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 18:06 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00289.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From maarten at contemplated dot nl 2005-05-06
17:14 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Tried to reproduce the problem but couldn't. Must have been some kind of
> glitch.
When trying to compile GCC3.4.3 on my mipsel-netbsd2.0 system (Cobalt RaQ 2) I
hit the exact s
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 18:01 ---
I opened a new bug 936.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 936 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
See
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=857
--
Summary: sh64-elf is broken
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at so
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-05-05 17:01
---
Created an attachment (id=477)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=477&action=view)
Proposed patch
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=876
--- You are receiving th
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
http://sources.redhat.com/bugz
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-06
17:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=480)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=480&action=view)
Test case
This is the newlib build failure:
/mnt/scratch/nightly/2005-05-05-sh-elf/sh64-elf/./gcc/
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 15:55 ---
Please get kernel patches at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/linux-2.4-seg-4.patch
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/linux-2.6-seg-5.patch
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-06
17:04 ---
Your write.c patch has broken sh64-elf.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From ibron2 at freemail dot hu 2005-05-06 16:48
---
I tried compiling binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2 with gcc-4.0.0-2 for mingw32 target,
and the result was the same.
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --target=i386-mingw32
And the error was: "tc-i386.h:443: error: array t
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 16:22 ---
No problem with the current binutils.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 16:13 ---
It is allowed by the ELF spec. Other compilers may generate such object
files on purpose. There is no need to warn.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 15:44 ---
Fixed with
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00273.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 16:06 ---
I closed after almost a year. Please reopen it with a small testcase if
it still fails.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 16:19 ---
Are they related?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21070
We do need a testcase.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 16:00 ---
Binutils 2.16 has been released. Nothing will be done for 2.15.
--
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 15:54 ---
Has this been fixed?
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=885
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 15:51 ---
Has it been fixed?
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=886
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 15:46 ---
Please find out which DSO references __gcov_execvp and why.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-06 16:03 ---
Please update binutils. 2.12.90.15 is way too old.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From gbeauchesne at mandriva dot com 2005-05-06
09:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=478)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=478&action=view)
Suggested patch
The comment says the symbols are provided if not building a shared library.
-pie a
--- Additional Comments From jbeulich at novell dot com 2005-05-06 06:59
---
Both the sparc failure and the ones mentioned in the previous entry being caused
by other reasons should be fixed now. None of the other mentioned targets'
maintainers reacted, and since they're not the topic of
26 matches
Mail list logo
